2017
DOI: 10.3382/ps/pex014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of feeding Original XPC™ to broilers with a live coccidiosis vaccine under industrial conditions: Part 2. Cecal microbiota analysis

Abstract: Biological supplements in poultry feed are of continued interest due to the improvements in growth performance, protection from pathogen invasion, and benefits in overall host health. The fermentation metabolites of Diamond V Original XPC™ (XPC) have previously been shown to improve commercial performance and reduce Salmonella in poultry. The current study sought to characterize the cecal microbiota using culture-independent analysis based on 16S rRNA gene in Coccivac-D sprayed broilers supplemented with XPC a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While both methods, DGGE-band sequencing and NGS results were somewhat similar there were differences as well. Such differences in outcomes between DGGE profiles and NGS microbiome sequencing of broiler cecal samples has been observed by our group in previous work [ 27 ]. Therefore, direct comparisons between the two methods must be exercised with caution as they differ considerably in both method and approach as discussed previously by Park et al, 2017 [ 27 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While both methods, DGGE-band sequencing and NGS results were somewhat similar there were differences as well. Such differences in outcomes between DGGE profiles and NGS microbiome sequencing of broiler cecal samples has been observed by our group in previous work [ 27 ]. Therefore, direct comparisons between the two methods must be exercised with caution as they differ considerably in both method and approach as discussed previously by Park et al, 2017 [ 27 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Such differences in outcomes between DGGE profiles and NGS microbiome sequencing of broiler cecal samples has been observed by our group in previous work [ 27 ]. Therefore, direct comparisons between the two methods must be exercised with caution as they differ considerably in both method and approach as discussed previously by Park et al, 2017 [ 27 ]. Obviously, DGGE-band sequencing relies on visualization of bands and physically excising these bands for sequencing which immediately introduces some operator error.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, several studies ( 25 29 ) investigated prebiotic effects on the GIT microbiota through 16S microbiome sequencing. By also noting changes in metabolite concentrations or metabolomics, this approach may be able to correlate changes in the microbiome to changes in the metabolite concentration such as SCFAs and other, possibly unknown, metabolites that can stymie Salmonella growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feed additives or changes in feed composition have also been shown to confer considerable effects on the gastrointestinal microbiota of poultry and are associated with enhancements in performance parameters (5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Furthermore, antibiotic supplementation has long been known to confer beneficial effects on bird performance and health, but this practice also has an impact on the avian microbiota and the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria (10)(11)(12)(13). This point has resulted in the reduction or elimination of antibiotic use in commercial poultry worldwide.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%