2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Feeding Management on the Equine Cecal Microbiota

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Remarkably, the contrast between R and S ponies was also found while comparing their respective gut microbiota composition. Although the constituent phyla and genera within the gut microbiota of R and S ponies were congruent with other studies based on horses (Costa et al, 2012, 2015; Mach et al, 2017; Shepherd et al, 2012; Steelman et al, 2012; Venable et al, 2017; Weese et al, 2015), e.g. members of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Spirochaetes and Fibrobacteres predominating, R ponies presented an increase of several Clostridiales and Bacteroides species at day 24, whereas only species related to Blautia and Paraprevotella genera were relatively more abundant in the S. Indisputably, individuals with different susceptibility to parasite infection adapt to environmental stress in different ways.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remarkably, the contrast between R and S ponies was also found while comparing their respective gut microbiota composition. Although the constituent phyla and genera within the gut microbiota of R and S ponies were congruent with other studies based on horses (Costa et al, 2012, 2015; Mach et al, 2017; Shepherd et al, 2012; Steelman et al, 2012; Venable et al, 2017; Weese et al, 2015), e.g. members of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Spirochaetes and Fibrobacteres predominating, R ponies presented an increase of several Clostridiales and Bacteroides species at day 24, whereas only species related to Blautia and Paraprevotella genera were relatively more abundant in the S. Indisputably, individuals with different susceptibility to parasite infection adapt to environmental stress in different ways.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Equine strongyles are in close contact with a large community of microorganisms in the host intestines, estimated to reach a concentration of 10 9 microorganisms per gram of ingesta in the cecum alone (Mackie and Wilkins, 1988), spanning 108 genera (Mach et al, 2017; Steelman et al, 2012; Venable et al, 2017) and at least seven phyla (Costa et al, 2012, 2015; Mach et al, 2017; Shepherd et al, 2012; Weese et al, 2015). Bacterial populations differ greatly throughout the various compartments of the equine gastrointestinal tract ( e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fecal DNA was extracted according to manufacturer’s guidelines using the MoBio Powerlyzer Powersoil Kit (MoBIO Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). After extraction, sequencing was performed at the W. M. Keck Center for Biotechnology at the University of Illinois as previously described [ 24 ]. Briefly, bacterial (V4 region of 16S rRNA; 515F/806R: 5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA, 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT), archaeal (ArchaeaF/ArchaeaR: 5′-GYGCASCAGKCGMGAAW, 5′-GGACTACVSGGGTATCTAAT) and fungal (ITS1F/ITS4R: 5′-TTCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG, 5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC) genes were amplified using a Fluidigm access array (Fluidigm, South San Francisco, CA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equine strongyles are in close contact with a large community of microorganisms in the host intestines, estimated to reach a concentration of 10 9 microorganisms per gram of ingesta in the cecum alone (Mackie and Wilkins, 1988 ), spanning 108 bacterial genera (Steelman et al, 2012 ; Mach et al, 2017 ; Venable et al, 2017 ) and at least seven phyla (Costa et al, 2012 , 2015 ; Shepherd et al, 2012 ; Weese et al, 2015 ; Mach et al, 2017 ). Bacterial populations differ greatly throughout the various compartments of the equine gastrointestinal tract (e.g., duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon) due to differences in the gut pH, available energy sources, epithelial architecture of each region, oxygen levels and physiological roles (Costa et al, 2015 ; Ericsson et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%