2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2011.00517.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Feed Type and Temperature on Growth of Juvenile Abalone, Haliotis discus hannai Ino

Abstract: Effects of feed type and temperature on growth and body composition of juvenile abalone, Haliotis discus hannai Ino, were determined. A 2 (feed types: formulated diet and dry sea tangle) × 3 (temperature conditions: 20, 23 and 26 C) factorial design with triplicate was used. Seventy juvenile abalone averaging 4.7 g were randomly distributed into each of 18, 50‐L plastic rectangular containers. Six containers were placed into each temperature condition of three 1.3 ton concrete flow‐through raceway systems. Aba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The growth rate observed in the present study is close to that estimated for wild H. rufescens in northern California (Rogers-Bennett, Rogers & Schultz 2007). Different environmental factors have been shown to influence growth rate in abalone, including water temperature (Kelly & Owen 2002;Searle, Roberts & Lokman 2006), amount and quality of food (Nidoo, Manveldt, Ruck & Bolton 2006;Cho & Kim 2012), stocking (Huang & Hseu 2010), and this kind of effect cannot be excluded in the Chilean population of red abalone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The growth rate observed in the present study is close to that estimated for wild H. rufescens in northern California (Rogers-Bennett, Rogers & Schultz 2007). Different environmental factors have been shown to influence growth rate in abalone, including water temperature (Kelly & Owen 2002;Searle, Roberts & Lokman 2006), amount and quality of food (Nidoo, Manveldt, Ruck & Bolton 2006;Cho & Kim 2012), stocking (Huang & Hseu 2010), and this kind of effect cannot be excluded in the Chilean population of red abalone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The growth rate observed in the present study is close to that estimated for wild H. rufescens in northern California (Rogers‐Bennett, Rogers & Schultz ). Different environmental factors have been shown to influence growth rate in abalone, including water temperature (Kelly & Owen ; Searle, Roberts & Lokman ), amount and quality of food (Nidoo, Manveldt, Ruck & Bolton ; Cho & Kim ), stocking density (Capinpin, Toledo, Encena & Doi ; Wu, Liu, Zhang & Wang ), oxygen concentration (Harris, Maguire, Edwards & Johns ), dissolved ammonia (Harris, Maguire, Edwards & Hindrum ), stress conditions (Hooper, Day, Slocombe, Handlinger & Benkendorff ), and combinations of some of those factors (Tung & Alfaro ). In red abalone, growth rate has been related with water temperature, food availability and diseases, like withering syndrome (González, Brokordt & Lohrmann ), and the interaction among these factors (Braid, Moore, Robbins, Hedrick, Tjeerdema & Friedman ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haliotis laevigata, H. rubra and Haliotis corrugata maintain a constant MO 2 within their T pref (Harris et al 2005;Romo et al 2010; Table 1) and are often found at their T pref in their natural habitat (Dahlhoff & Somero 1993). This temperature also corresponds to the highest growth rate in most species Harris et al 2005;Green et al 2011;Cho & Kim 2012).…”
Section: Temperaturementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Chang and Wang () reported the effects of temperature (14, 17 and 20°C) on the energy budget of H. discus hannai (experimental body weight: 0.08–3.23 g/ind), finding that the growth energy was the highest at 20°C. Cho and Kim () found the weight gain of H. discus hannai (experimental body weight: 4.6–9.1 g/ind) decreased with the increasing temperature (20, 23 and 26°C), but there was no significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%