2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-59161/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Fear of COVID-19 on Mental Well-Being and Quality of Life: A path analysis

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has been very disruptive and thus likely to result in substantial challenges to mental health. This study aimed to investigate the effects of fear of COVID-19 on mental well-being and quality of life among Saudi adult population, and to evaluate the impact of perceived social support. A total of 1029 Saudi adults with a mean age of 33.7 years (SD 11.5) took part in an anonymous online survey. Path analysis indicated that fear of COVID-19 was directly associated with mental well-being, whi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is interesting to note that social support did not have a significant effect on QoL. However, literature reports social support as an essential resource for coping with different stressors ( Warner et al, 2015 ), including those within a pandemic context ( Alyami et al, 2020 ). From a psychometric point of view, this finding could be explained by the so-called ceiling effect ( Michalos, 2014 ), given a high mean score, low variability of the sample (social support, mean: 4.2 on a 5-point scale; SD: 0.7), together with a relatively low number of participants ( N = 213).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, it is interesting to note that social support did not have a significant effect on QoL. However, literature reports social support as an essential resource for coping with different stressors ( Warner et al, 2015 ), including those within a pandemic context ( Alyami et al, 2020 ). From a psychometric point of view, this finding could be explained by the so-called ceiling effect ( Michalos, 2014 ), given a high mean score, low variability of the sample (social support, mean: 4.2 on a 5-point scale; SD: 0.7), together with a relatively low number of participants ( N = 213).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) was originally developed for the general population in Iran to evaluate the emotional response to COVID-19 and it was published in the English version ( Ahorsu et al, 2020b ). Subsequently, this scale has been translated from English and validated in many languages, i.e., Arabic ( Alyami et al, 2020 ), Bangla ( Sakib et al, 2020 ), Brazilian Portuguese ( Faro et al, 2020 ), English ( Perz, Lang & Harrington, 2020 ; Winter et al, 2020 ), French ( Mailliez, Griffiths & Carre, 2020 ), Italian ( Soraci et al, 2020 ), Malay ( Pang et al, 2020 ), Persian ( Ahorsu et al, 2020b ), Spanish ( Barrios et al, 2020 ; Huarcaya-Victoria et al, 2020 ; Martínez-Lorca et al, 2020 ), Tamil ( Bharatharaj et al, 2020 ), Turkish ( Haktanir, Seki & Dilmaç, 2020 ; Satici et al, 2020 ), Urdu ( Mahmood, Jafree & Qureshi, 2020 ), Chinese ( Chi et al, 2021 ), Hebrew ( Bitan et al, 2020 ), Japanese ( Masuyama, Shinkawa & Kubo, 2020 ), Russian-Belarusian ( Reznik et al, 2020 ), Romanian ( Stănculescu, 2021 ), and Taiwanese ( Chang et al, 2020 ). Previous scale validations covered many internally varied and different in size groups, e.g., 629 adolescents from two junior high schools in Japan ( Masuyama, Shinkawa & Kubo, 2020 ), 1,700 participants aged 10–57 in China ( Chi et al, 2021 ), or 693 members of the general Saudi population who were at least 18 years of age ( Alyami et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FCV-19S has been used in a number of published research on the relationships in terms of such important psychological issues as depression, anxiety and stress ( Ahorsu et al, 2020b ; Perz, Lang & Harrington, 2020 ; Bitan et al, 2020 ; Alyami et al, 2020 ), mental wellbeing ( Ahmed et al, 2020 ; Winter et al, 2020 ), specific phobia(s) ( Soraci et al, 2020 ), satisfaction with life ( Satici et al, 2020 ), psychological distress ( Alyami et al, 2020 ), post-traumatic stress disorder ( Huarcaya-Victoria et al, 2020 ), generalized anxiety disorder ( Tsipropoulou et al, 2020 ), resilience, self-compassion ( Chi et al, 2021 ), perceived vulnerability to disease ( Masuyama, Shinkawa & Kubo, 2020 ), preventive behavior during the pandemic ( Ahorsu et al, 2020a ), germ aversion, or even political beliefs ( Winter et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, it is interesting to note that social support did not have a significant effect on QoL. However, literature reports social support as an essential resource for coping with different stressors (Warner et al, 2015), including those within a pandemic context (Alyami et al, 2020). From a psychometric point of view, this finding could be explained by the so-called ceiling effect (Michalos, 2014), given a high mean score, low variability of the sample (social support, mean: 4.2 on a 5-point scale; SD: 0.7), together with a relatively low number of participants (N = 213).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%