DOI: 10.30707/etd2015.jozwik.s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects Of Explicit Reading Comprehension Strategy Instruction For English Learners With Specific Learning Disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both teacher- and computer-led versions of the intervention incorporated instructional strategies that are beneficial for ELs, such as immediate affirmative and corrective feedback, frequent practice opportunities, and discussion of the text (Ehara, 2009 ; Jozwik, 2015 ; Taboada & Rutherford, 2011 ), suggesting that the difference in the influence of language status across instruction modalities may be due to inherent differences in teacher-led instruction (both for the inference intervention and BAU instruction) versus computer-delivered instruction. Computer-delivered instruction was limited to a standard delivery of affirmative feedback and corrective feedback that included the explanation of one incorrect example, which may not be sufficient for ELs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both teacher- and computer-led versions of the intervention incorporated instructional strategies that are beneficial for ELs, such as immediate affirmative and corrective feedback, frequent practice opportunities, and discussion of the text (Ehara, 2009 ; Jozwik, 2015 ; Taboada & Rutherford, 2011 ), suggesting that the difference in the influence of language status across instruction modalities may be due to inherent differences in teacher-led instruction (both for the inference intervention and BAU instruction) versus computer-delivered instruction. Computer-delivered instruction was limited to a standard delivery of affirmative feedback and corrective feedback that included the explanation of one incorrect example, which may not be sufficient for ELs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social interactionist theory of language acquisition places more emphasis on learning language through more informal situations such as discussions. Peer-mediated instruction (PMI) has been demonstrated as effective with ELs (Calhoon, Otaiba, Cihak, King, & Avalos, 2007;Choi, Oh, Yoon, & Hong, 2012;Jozwik & Douglas, 2017a;McMaster, Kung, Han, & Cao, 2008;Sáenz, Fuchs, & Fuchs, 2007) which occurs through Peer Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) or Cooperative Learning Structures (CLS). PMI was developed and utilized within the field of autism as a way for typically-developing students to interact and help individuals with autism to learn new social skills through increasing social opportunities within the natural environment (English, Goldstein, Shafter, & Kaczmarek,1997;Odom et al, 1999;Strain & Odom, 1986).…”
Section: Social Interactionist Theory Of Language Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stephanie Gardiner-Walsh, thank you for recommending Amazon Word Transcription and helping me navigate through that by responding quickly to text messages. (Jozwik & Douglas, 2017a). Approximately 4.8 million students in U.S. public schools speak a language other than English in the home (National Center for Education Statistics [NCES], 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategies selected for the MAPP tools are grounded in demonstrated effective reading comprehension approaches for students with LD who are EB (Chiang & Liu, 2011; Haagar & Windmueller, 2001; Jozwik & Douglas, 2017; Orosco & O’Connor, 2014; Sáenz et al, 2005; Santoro et al, 2006). However, what is important across all studies was the interactive nature of how teachers taught and students utilized these strategies.…”
Section: Interactive Reading Comprehension Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%