2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of exopolysaccharide fractions with different molecular weights and compositions on fecal microflora during in vitro fermentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Preparation of fecal slurry was performed by using a previously described method with slight modifications [18]. The fresh fecal samples were provided by three healthy volunteers (ages 20-28) who had no history of gastrointestinal disease and were not treated with antibiotics within six months.…”
Section: Fecal Microbiota Regulatory Activity Of Eps 2101 Fecal Slurry Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Preparation of fecal slurry was performed by using a previously described method with slight modifications [18]. The fresh fecal samples were provided by three healthy volunteers (ages 20-28) who had no history of gastrointestinal disease and were not treated with antibiotics within six months.…”
Section: Fecal Microbiota Regulatory Activity Of Eps 2101 Fecal Slurry Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the EPS produced by Lpb. plantarum NMGL2 on the fecal microbiota change could be due to the relatively low molecular weight (3.03 × 10 4 Da) and monosaccharide composition of the EPS, which benefited digestion of the polymer by the microbiota and growth of certain microbes, e.g., Firmicutes in the early fermentation stage [18]. The EPS-induced increase in the abundance of Actinobacteria containing probiotic Bifidobacterium would be beneficial to human health.…”
Section: Otus Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Полимеры обеспечивают посредничество в межбактериальных взаимодействиях или/и изменяют колонизационные и персистентные свойства бифидофлоры в различных экологических нишах [22,23]. ЭПС могут выступать в качестве микроб-ассоциированных молекулярных паттернов и взаимодействовать с клетками макроорганизма, способствуя формированию биопленок [12,14] [24,25]. В целом предполагают, что ЭПС у бифидобактерий выполняют те же функции, что и у других микроорганизмов.…”
Section: биологическая роль эпс бифидобактерийunclassified
“…Относительно недавно Salazar et al сообщили о способности кишечной микробиоты использовать ЭПС лактобактерий и бифидобактерий в качестве субстратов для питания [28]. На моделях in vitro показана способность ЭПС бифидобактерий изменять профиль и разнообразие кишечной микробиоты, вызывать сдвиги в метаболической активности микросимбионтов, в частности в синтезе короткоцепочечных жирных кислот [25]. Способность B. fragilis вызывать деградацию ЭПС бифидобактерий была доказана путем их культивирования на минимальной среде с полимерами бифидобактерий в качестве единственного источника углерода.…”
Section: биологическая роль эпс бифидобактерийunclassified
“…Non-cultural methods of bacteria enumeration, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), have greatly enhanced the accuracy of prebiotic activity assessment. The range of analyzed prebiotics has been greatly expanded recently: exopolysaccharide from Cordyceps sinensis Cs-HK1 [20], xylooligosaccharides produced by Bacillus subtilis 3610 [21], extracts of brown seaweed [22], and so on. Basing on the data obtained from the fermentation of fecal cultures, Palframan, Gibson, and Rastall [23] suggested calculation of a prebiotic index (PI), which was determined as the difference between the number of probiotics and non-probiotics at the end of the fermentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%