2003
DOI: 10.1080/09064700310017967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Energy Level and Enzyme Supplementation in Wheat-Based Layer Diets on Hen Performance and Egg Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All data collected were analyzed by two-way analysis of varianc (in 2×3 factorial design) considering the dietary ME and iodine source as the main effect, using the following model: Yijk = µ +Ei +Tj + (ET) ij+ eijk where: Y ijk =an observation; µ = Overall mean; Ei = effect of dietary ME level (i =1, 2 and 3); Tj = effect of dietary iodine source (j =1 and 2); (ET)ij = interaction between ME level Ei by iodine source Tj and eijk = experimental random error RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Productive performance: Laying rate: Regarding to levels of metabolizable energy (ME), data in Table 2 showed that egg laying rate (LR) showed insignificant differences among the groups fed diets differ on its content of ME. These results are in disagreement with those obtained by Ciftci et al (2003) who noted that reducing the dietary energy content from 2751 to 2641 Kcal of ME/kg increased the egg production from 86.44 to 88.27%. Also, Kout El-kloub et al (2005) displayed that the diets containing 14%CP and 2600 kcal ME/kg improved egg production for Mamourah laying hens.…”
Section: -Number Of Hatched Chicks Per Hen=contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All data collected were analyzed by two-way analysis of varianc (in 2×3 factorial design) considering the dietary ME and iodine source as the main effect, using the following model: Yijk = µ +Ei +Tj + (ET) ij+ eijk where: Y ijk =an observation; µ = Overall mean; Ei = effect of dietary ME level (i =1, 2 and 3); Tj = effect of dietary iodine source (j =1 and 2); (ET)ij = interaction between ME level Ei by iodine source Tj and eijk = experimental random error RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Productive performance: Laying rate: Regarding to levels of metabolizable energy (ME), data in Table 2 showed that egg laying rate (LR) showed insignificant differences among the groups fed diets differ on its content of ME. These results are in disagreement with those obtained by Ciftci et al (2003) who noted that reducing the dietary energy content from 2751 to 2641 Kcal of ME/kg increased the egg production from 86.44 to 88.27%. Also, Kout El-kloub et al (2005) displayed that the diets containing 14%CP and 2600 kcal ME/kg improved egg production for Mamourah laying hens.…”
Section: -Number Of Hatched Chicks Per Hen=contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…While, Mathlouthi et al (2002) observed an improve on laying rate at dietary energy content of 2753 kcal of ME/kg of diet compared with 2653 kcal of ME/kg of diet. Responses of egg weight to changes in dietary energy content are insignificant (Ciftci et al, 2003). However, some investigators have reported significant results, although small, increases in egg weight due to increased dietary energy was observed (Marsden et al, 1987and Peguri andCoon, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are some reports indicating that enzyme supplementation of laying hen diets had no influence on eggshell quality and thickness. 51,52 However, in a study by Jaroni and Scheideler 53 it was noted that the specific gravity of eggs declined significantly (P < 0.01) in diets with xylanase supplementation compared with diets without enzyme supplementation; the authors suggested that this decline could have been a result of improved egg size (as indicated by increased albumen and yolk) and correspondingly thinner shells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These discrepancies may be due to the xanthophyll content of the main feed ingredients rather than to the actual energy levels, for the xanthophyll levels were not controlled within the diets. This could be due to high carotenoid content of corn (Ciftci et al, 2003). Significant MET × TAL interaction was also observed for shell strength ( Table 6).…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 76%