2009
DOI: 10.1134/s1021443709040104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of endophytic fungi on some drought tolerance mechanisms of tall fescue in a hydroponics culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported in endophyte-infected Lolium perenne [36]. On the other hand, the greater proline concentration in roots of E- RAB plants compared to E+ plants at the lowest water availability and the larger amount of dead leaves suggests that E+ plants were less stressed, which agrees with results reported for endophytic tall fescue shoots [17,23]. Proline metabolism may be affected in E+ plants because this amino acid is a product of ergot alkaloid breakdown and peramine synthesis, both produced by the endophyte [16,78].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similar results were reported in endophyte-infected Lolium perenne [36]. On the other hand, the greater proline concentration in roots of E- RAB plants compared to E+ plants at the lowest water availability and the larger amount of dead leaves suggests that E+ plants were less stressed, which agrees with results reported for endophytic tall fescue shoots [17,23]. Proline metabolism may be affected in E+ plants because this amino acid is a product of ergot alkaloid breakdown and peramine synthesis, both produced by the endophyte [16,78].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The relatively lower accumulation of proline in endophytic plants could, therefore, be an indication that there is less damage in endophytic drought-stressed plants. Relatively lower levels of proline in endophytic plants than nonendophytic plants under stress has been reported by others (Elbersen and West, 1997;Hahn et al, 2008;Pandey et al, 2016;Shukla et al, 2012;Vazquez-de-Aldana et al, 2013;Yang et al, 2014), as has increased proline levels in endophytic plants under stress (Bae et al, 2009;Cong et al, 2015;Molina-Montenegro et al, 2016;Nagabhyru et al, 2013;Zhang and Nan, 2007) and no change in proline (Bayat et al, 2009;Nagabhyru et al, 2013). The proline response may depend on the host-endophyte interaction and the level of stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Karcher et al (2008) concluded that the reduction in DMY under water stress is a drought avoidance mechanism in most turf grasses. Chlorophyll content is a major determinant of photosynthetic capacity under stress, i.e., higher chlorophyll content and stability of it have been reported to be associated with drought tolerance (Mensah et al, 2006;Bayat et al, 2009). Thus, selecting genotypes based on increased or stable chlorophyll content may prevent yield loss under water stress.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%