Abstract:The current study evaluated connections between marital distress, harsh parenting, and child externalizing behaviors in line with predictions from the Family Stress Model (FSM). Prospective, longitudinal data came from 273 mothers, fathers, and children participating when the child was 2, between 3 to 5, and 6 to 10 years old. Assessments included observational and self-report measures. Information regarding economic hardship and economic pressure were assessed during toddlerhood, and parental emotional distre… Show more
“…For example, the current study replicates results utilizing the same sample but extending offspring age into emerging adulthood (Conger & Conger, 2002; Conger et al, 2010), as well as those that have studied these associations with the offspring and their next generation child. For example, Neppl, et al (2016) found that pathways of the Family Stress Model operated in a similar fashion when the offspring from the current study became parents themselves. The current investigation also extends work conducted by others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Similarly, Ponnet (2014) investigated financial stress and found that parental depressive symptoms, parental conflict, and parenting mediated the association between financial stress and adolescent problem behavior. Many studies utilizing the Family Stress Model use cross-sectional data (Conger et al, 2010) or omit certain pathways of the model such that they may include harsh parenting but not marital conflict (see Neppl, et al, 2016). Thus, the current study extends research by including all family related pathways of the Family Stress Model, specifically examining how economic pressure in early adolescence influences family processes in middle adolescence and drinking behaviors into emerging adulthood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interparental hostility, antisocial behavior, and angry coerciveness from one spouse toward the other during the video-taped marital discussion task was assessed when the adolescent was 14 and 15 years old (Neppl et al, 2016). Each rating was scored on a 9-point scale, ranging from 1 (no evidence of the behavior) to 9 (the behavior is highly characteristic of the spouse).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite evidence that economic pressure is associated with family stress processes to predict child outcomes, most studies utilizing the Family Stress Model predict to child or adolescent outcomes (Benner & Kim, 2010; Conger et al, 1991; Neppl, Senia, & Donnellan, 2016; Scaramella, Sohr-Preston, Callahan, & Mirabile, 2008), and have not extended family processes as experienced in adolescence to behavior in emerging adulthood. In addition, although studies have applied the Family Stress Model to predict substance use in adolescence, most have used cross-sectional data which limits temporal ordering of causal influences (Conger et al, 1991).…”
The Family Stress Model proposes that disrupted family processes may help explain the association between economic adversity and poor child developmental outcomes. In this study, the Family Stress Model was tested across adolescence to emerging adulthood. Participants included 451 rural White youth who participated with their parents from age 13-23 (52% female). The data were analyzed at five developmental time periods with separate pathways for mothers and fathers. The findings reveal for both parents that economic pressure at time 1 (age 13) led to parental emotional distress which was related to harsh couple interaction at time 2 (ages 14 and 15). This marital conflict was related to harsh parenting toward the adolescent (time 2), which was then directly associated with higher levels of offspring drinking when youth were in middle adolescence (age 16) at time 3. Alcohol use in middle adolescence was associated with binge drinking in late adolescence (age 18, time 4) into emerging adulthood (age 23, time 5). Drinking behaviors did not differ for boys and girls. The current results show that economic adversity has an effect on family processes which influence offspring binge drinking patterns in later adolescence that continue into emerging adulthood.
“…For example, the current study replicates results utilizing the same sample but extending offspring age into emerging adulthood (Conger & Conger, 2002; Conger et al, 2010), as well as those that have studied these associations with the offspring and their next generation child. For example, Neppl, et al (2016) found that pathways of the Family Stress Model operated in a similar fashion when the offspring from the current study became parents themselves. The current investigation also extends work conducted by others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Similarly, Ponnet (2014) investigated financial stress and found that parental depressive symptoms, parental conflict, and parenting mediated the association between financial stress and adolescent problem behavior. Many studies utilizing the Family Stress Model use cross-sectional data (Conger et al, 2010) or omit certain pathways of the model such that they may include harsh parenting but not marital conflict (see Neppl, et al, 2016). Thus, the current study extends research by including all family related pathways of the Family Stress Model, specifically examining how economic pressure in early adolescence influences family processes in middle adolescence and drinking behaviors into emerging adulthood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interparental hostility, antisocial behavior, and angry coerciveness from one spouse toward the other during the video-taped marital discussion task was assessed when the adolescent was 14 and 15 years old (Neppl et al, 2016). Each rating was scored on a 9-point scale, ranging from 1 (no evidence of the behavior) to 9 (the behavior is highly characteristic of the spouse).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite evidence that economic pressure is associated with family stress processes to predict child outcomes, most studies utilizing the Family Stress Model predict to child or adolescent outcomes (Benner & Kim, 2010; Conger et al, 1991; Neppl, Senia, & Donnellan, 2016; Scaramella, Sohr-Preston, Callahan, & Mirabile, 2008), and have not extended family processes as experienced in adolescence to behavior in emerging adulthood. In addition, although studies have applied the Family Stress Model to predict substance use in adolescence, most have used cross-sectional data which limits temporal ordering of causal influences (Conger et al, 1991).…”
The Family Stress Model proposes that disrupted family processes may help explain the association between economic adversity and poor child developmental outcomes. In this study, the Family Stress Model was tested across adolescence to emerging adulthood. Participants included 451 rural White youth who participated with their parents from age 13-23 (52% female). The data were analyzed at five developmental time periods with separate pathways for mothers and fathers. The findings reveal for both parents that economic pressure at time 1 (age 13) led to parental emotional distress which was related to harsh couple interaction at time 2 (ages 14 and 15). This marital conflict was related to harsh parenting toward the adolescent (time 2), which was then directly associated with higher levels of offspring drinking when youth were in middle adolescence (age 16) at time 3. Alcohol use in middle adolescence was associated with binge drinking in late adolescence (age 18, time 4) into emerging adulthood (age 23, time 5). Drinking behaviors did not differ for boys and girls. The current results show that economic adversity has an effect on family processes which influence offspring binge drinking patterns in later adolescence that continue into emerging adulthood.
“…It has also been established that family level conflict influences parenting behaviors during long-term contextual pressures (Barajas-Gonzalez & Brooks-Gunn, 2014;Neppl, Senia, & Donnellan, 2016). For instance, families who have children that suffer from chronic pain indicate higher levels of conflict, and lower levels of cohesion (Palermo, Valrie, Karlson, 2014).…”
Section: Family Environment: Cohesion Conflict and Achievement Oriementioning
Many studies address the influences of parenting and contextual factors on child development (Belsky, 1984). Although long-term contextual factors such as poverty and abuse have been shown to be associated with both parent and child behaviors (La Placa & Corlyon, 2016;Salzinger et al, 2002), little research exists on the degree to which short-term situational contexts may affect child behavior. The goal of this study is to identify the influence of parenting behavior on child response after a competitive motocross race. Survey data was collected from 33 parents at several child/adolescent competitions held at a motocross track. First, results indicated that hostility exhibited by the trackside parent, or the parent that spends the most time with their child trackside, at a motocross race was positively related to their child crying after a competition. Additionally, achievement orientation and family cohesion were both positively related to having a child celebrate after the race. Results also show that some situational factors have an influence on child behavior over and above the influence of the family environment factors. Specifically, trackside parent hostility significantly predicts crying after a race. This work informs the literature on the degree to which short-term situational contexts may affect child behavior, as well as provides insight into parent-child relationships within the context of motocross.
The COVID‐19 pandemic brings to light many areas the field of counselling and psychotherapy may need to address in future research. We outline several issues stemming from or exacerbated by the pandemic and offer suggestions for future research to address the mental health needs of those impacted. Our suggestions focus on five domains: (a) the health and well‐being of helping professionals, (b) the infodemic, (c) discrimination and minority stress, (d) spiritual and existential dynamics in mental health and (e) couple and family stress and resilience. We aim to provide a multi‐systemic perspective of mental health and well‐being in the time of COVID‐19, as well as encourage current and future studies to incorporate these suggestions to advance the health and well‐being of our communities through evidence‐based treatment approaches.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.