Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of early prevention programs on adult criminal offending: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This policy is in line with the recommendations of a recent meta-analysis of crime prevention programs, which emphasize the importance of a multimodal approach in which both proximal (individual) and distal (community level) risk factors are addressed (Deković, Slagt, Asscher, Eichelsheim, & Prinzie, 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…This policy is in line with the recommendations of a recent meta-analysis of crime prevention programs, which emphasize the importance of a multimodal approach in which both proximal (individual) and distal (community level) risk factors are addressed (Deković, Slagt, Asscher, Eichelsheim, & Prinzie, 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Our finding that the effects of Incredible Years on improved parenting and child behavior were not influenced by families' socioeconomic and ethnic background adds to the growing body of evidence on the effectiveness of parenting interventions across families from different socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds (e.g., Deković et al, 2011;Leijten et al, 2013;Shelleby & Shaw, 2013). More specifically, the cultural sensitive character of Incredible Years may contribute to the program's effectiveness across families with different backgrounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Despite consensus on the need to engage families with socioeconomically disadvantaged and ethnic minority backgrounds in early intervention programs, these families appear to be hard to reach for parenting interventions in most European countries and North America. Once engaged in parenting interventions, meta-analytic findings are inconsistent about the extent to which families with socioeconomic disadvantage benefit less (e.g., Lundahl, Risser, & Lovejoy, 2006;Reyno & McGrath, 2006), less lasting (Leijten, Raaijmakers, Orobio de Castro, & Matthys, 2013), or more (Deković et al, 2011) from parenting interventions. Ethnic minority parents who have relatively recent immigration experiences often face difficulties with language and culture differences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Family Stress Theory highlights the indirect impact of financial strain on children through parental stress and associated compromises in parenting (see Conger & Donnellan, 2007, for a review). Accordingly, low-income families are not only more vulnerable to disruptions in caregiver (e.g., parental stress, depression, emotion dysregulation) and family (e.g., parent-child and marital conflict) functioning implicated in the development and exacerbation of maladaptive child behavior (see Dekovic et al, 2011; Jones et al, 2013; Lundahl, Risser, & Lovejoy, 2006; Piquero, Farrington, Welsh, Tremblay, & Jennings, 2009, for reviews), but that these factors also interfere with treatment seeking and engagement (see Eyberg, Nelson, & Boggs, 2008; McMahon & Forehand, 2003; Reyno & McGrath, 2006; Thomas & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2007, for reviews).…”
Section: Optimize Recruitment Engagement and Retention Via Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data suggest that if we successfully engage low-income families in Behavioral Parent Training (BPT) services, they benefit as much, if not more, than relatively higher income families, particularly at post-treatment and when the problem behaviors are in the clinical range (see Dekovic et al, 2011; Leijten, Raaijmakers, de Castro, & Matthys, 2013; Reyno & McGrath, 2006, for reviews). Financial strain and associated difficulties (e.g., poor mental/physical health, un/underemployment, lack of health insurance/underinsured), however, decrease the probability that low-income families will engage at a level necessary for BPT to be efficacious (e.g., 12 to 28 session hours, midweek telephone check-ins, daily home practice; see Eyberg, Nelson, & Boggs, 2008; McMahon & Forehand, 2003; Reyno & McGrath, 2006; Thomas & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2007).…”
Section: Examples Of Mental Health Services and Intervention Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%