Perceptions of Interprofessional Collaboration

Abstract

Interprofessional collaboration has been described both as an opportunity to meet the demands of a complex society, but also as a potential threat to professional autonomy. Interprofessional relationships are central in collaborative efforts, and there is a need to investigate the psychosocial processes involved. In the present study, we have investigated how professionals in a collaborative effort perceive collaboration, and how these perceptions are organized. We have used an adaptation of the Perception of Interprofessional Collaboration Model Questionnaire-PINCOM-Q-to develop and test a model of collaboration perceptions in a sample of professionals working within local crime prevention at the community level. Using a confirmatory factor analysis approach, we have found support for a three-dimensional conceptualisation of how interprofessional collaboration is perceived. We have labelled the dimensions in the model as follows: Group Climate, Influence, and Personal Motivation. Our results implicate that the development of interprofessional collaboration should emphasize supportive group communication, an equal distribution of group influence, and finally, a personal value outcome gained from participating in the collaboration.

Good Lives Model: Importance of Interagency Collaboration in Preventing Violent Recidivism

“…The primary benefit of interagency collaboration is improved access to different expertise and resources, which enables a holistic approach to client care [68]. With the common goal being the reduction of violence, a variety of agencies have specialized skills that could increase the possibility of fulfilling this.…”

Samarbeid i saker om vold og overgrep

“…Potensielt problematiske sider ved samarbeid tematiseres i liten grad i denne litteraturen. I den grad profesjonelle motsetninger adresseres, er problemstillingen gjerne hvordan de kan løses slik at samarbeid oppnås eller bedres (for eksempel Strype, Gundhus, Egge & Ødegård, 2014). At samarbeid er positivt, er med andre ord et underliggende, men ofte uuttalt premiss.…”

Performance-based policy in offender rehabilitation: Limitation or innovation for front-line workers in Liaison and Diversion services?

“…Strategies devised to assist these have to address clusters of correlated needs and provide multifaceted solutions (Andrews and Bonta, 2016) in a timely manner (Armstrong, 2012; Ministry of Justice UK, 2013; Sinha, 2010) so to ensure desistance from further criminal behaviour (Fazel and Danesh, 2002; Fazel and Wolf, 2015; World Health Organization, 2005). To that end, the involvement of welfare services in the rehabilitation process is crucial to increase the individuals’ chances of remaining crime-free (Hean et al, 2009; Strype et al, 2014).…”