2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of distance from canal and degradation history on peat bulk density in a degraded tropical peatland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
46
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly so, given that water tables at Forested, a near natural site, did not conform to the 40 cm limit. Moreover, Sinclair et al (2020) reported water‐table depths deeper than 40 cm in a relatively undisturbed tropical peatland site (Table 2). While human‐induced actions in lowering peatland water level exacerbate fire risk (Evers et al, 2017; Wijedasa et al, 2017), further research is required to understand natural system water‐table variability for forested tropical peatlands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is particularly so, given that water tables at Forested, a near natural site, did not conform to the 40 cm limit. Moreover, Sinclair et al (2020) reported water‐table depths deeper than 40 cm in a relatively undisturbed tropical peatland site (Table 2). While human‐induced actions in lowering peatland water level exacerbate fire risk (Evers et al, 2017; Wijedasa et al, 2017), further research is required to understand natural system water‐table variability for forested tropical peatlands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, non‐drainage disturbances to peatlands include deforestation, use of fire to clear land, and conversion for agricultural use (Dohong et al., 2017). These disturbances, independent of drainage, may in turn cause secondary impacts to ecohydrological variables, such as water table depth (Hirano et al., 2009), soil physical properties such as bulk density, pore structure, and hydraulic conductivity (Kurnianto et al., 2018; Sinclair et al., 2020; Wells et al., 2016). They can also impact evapotranspiration due to shifts in photosynthetic rates and rooting depth (Hirano et al., 2015; Manoli et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although drainage density and distance to canals have an inverse relationship ( Figure S4), it is not exactly one-to-one, depending on the details of the canal geometry in a given location. Furthermore, distance to canals is a potentially more informative predictor of subsidence (relative to drainage density alone), since it is expected to more closely match the effect of canals on nearby water table depths than drainage density alone (Sinclair et al, 2020). Thus, we chose to include both drainage metrics in the model.…”
Section: Subsidence Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, if the diversity and composition of forest stands are damaged, the ecosystem condition is less stable. Peat forest areas where the ecosystem experiences deforestation and degradation have a significant impact on the surrounding environmental conditions and is prone to land fires in the dry season [5]- [10]. The disturbance on the peat swamp forest ecosystem is a factor that causes changes to the diversity of plant species and the composition that grows in them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%