2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of different wavelengths of low-level laser therapy on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption in rats investigated with micro–computerized tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, an energy density of 8 J/cm 2 has been used, which is similar to that employed by Yousry et al [ 35 ], as well as Goymen and Gulec [ 24 ]. By reviewing the literature, a wide range of energy density values have been documented with laser administration, where several authors used lower energy doses such as 3.6 J/cm 2 [ 22 ], and 4.8 J/cm 2 [ 16 , 21 ], and others used higher doses such as 54 J/cm 2 [ 36 ], and 75 J/cm 2 [ 20 ]. In the present work, the administered laser energy dose was 8 J/cm 2 , delivered through a single application of 8 s against the maxillary canine root, dispensing a beam spot size of 1 cm 2 using the flat top handpiece.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, an energy density of 8 J/cm 2 has been used, which is similar to that employed by Yousry et al [ 35 ], as well as Goymen and Gulec [ 24 ]. By reviewing the literature, a wide range of energy density values have been documented with laser administration, where several authors used lower energy doses such as 3.6 J/cm 2 [ 22 ], and 4.8 J/cm 2 [ 16 , 21 ], and others used higher doses such as 54 J/cm 2 [ 36 ], and 75 J/cm 2 [ 20 ]. In the present work, the administered laser energy dose was 8 J/cm 2 , delivered through a single application of 8 s against the maxillary canine root, dispensing a beam spot size of 1 cm 2 using the flat top handpiece.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, PBM therapy provides a more precise scope of action compared to pulsed electromagnetic fields. Furthermore, PBM therapy possesses strong controllability, as different light parameters can lead to varying outcomes [42][43][44], allowing for personalized adjustments based on specific circumstances and patient responses [156]. Also, PBM therapy does not cause tissue damage, inflammation, or infection; instead, it may provide relief from these conditions [160].…”
Section: Comparison Between Pbm and The Other Methods In Otmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these advantages, PBM therapy also has some limitations. The efficacy of PBM therapy in OTM may vary among individuals and there is a lack of standardized protocols regarding the optimal light parameters for PBM therapy [42][43][44], which makes it challenging to establish uniform treatment guidelines and contributes to variations in treatment outcomes. Additionally, although some studies have investigated the effects of PBM therapy in orthodontics, the existing evidence on the efficacy of PBM therapy in orthodontic tooth movement is limited, and further high-quality studies, especially well-designed RCTs, are needed to confirm its benefits and limitations in clinical practice.…”
Section: Comparison Between Pbm and The Other Methods In Otmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Same as previous research, the assessment of OIIRR was measured by micro-CT. 40,41 The detection was performed on the coronal plane slice of the mesial root of the maxillary rst molar. The outer and inner boundaries of the mesial root were determined from the cementoenamel junction to the root apex (Fig.…”
Section: Assessment Of Oiirrmentioning
confidence: 99%