2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2005.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of different mowing regimes on seedling recruitment in alluvial grasslands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
36
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
36
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this hypothesis does not convincingly explain our results because aboveground plant biomass at our sites (Table 1) ) where seed size and seed-limitation of population size were positively related (Bissels et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…However, this hypothesis does not convincingly explain our results because aboveground plant biomass at our sites (Table 1) ) where seed size and seed-limitation of population size were positively related (Bissels et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Török et al 2010b) and can hamper the establishment and immigration of further target species. The removal of accumulated litter by grazing and mowing can be highly beneficial to post-restoration processes as litter removal can open up niches for further colonisation of target herbs from adjacent vegetation (Bissels et al 2006). However, gaps may also provide physical space for the germination and establishment of weedy species present in the seed bank, especially in that of former croplands.…”
Section: Grazing and Mowingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Un'ulteriore misura per mitigare gli effetti negativi dello sfalcio potrebbe infine consistere nel gestire i terreni ritirati dalla produzione in modo tale da garantire la presenza di appezzamenti -o in alcuni casi anche solo strisce di vegetazione -in cui lo sfalcio non viene eseguito, o in cui viene eseguito con una tempistica differenziata. Ciò consentirebbe l'esistenza costante di zone che possano fungere da rifugio temporaneo o da sito alternativo per gli Artropodi (Painter, 1999;citazioni Balmer e Erhardt, 2000;Braschler et al, 2009;Humbert et al, 2009;Noordijk et al, 2010 e citazioni ivi presenti), per la fauna vertebrata (Edgar et al, 2010) e per la flora (Köhler et al, 2005;Bissels et al, 2006;Valkó et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussione E Conclusioniunclassified