Effects of Dietary Selenomethionine Supplementation on Growth Performance, Meat Quality and Antioxidant Property in Yellow Broilers

Jiang, Zhonghong; Lin, Yingcai; Guiyuan, Zhou; Luo, Lihuan; Jiang, Sufei; Chen, Fang

doi:10.1021/jf902411c

Cited by 96 publications

(65 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…L-Selenomethionine supplementation significantly (p<0.05) increased T-AOC in the kidney, pancreas, and breast muscle ( Table 8). The results were in agreement with previous reports [9,34]. These findings suggested that Se-Met improved antioxidative status of broilers by elevating activities of antioxidant enzymes and concentrations of antioxidant and reducing the metabolic product of lipid peroxides of MDA concentration, and also implicated that Se-Met supplementation may have a beneficial effect on oxidative stability and extended shelf life of fresh meat than SS.…”

Section: Selenomethionine Treatments Versus Sodium Selenitesupporting

confidence: 93%

“…However, in the present study, GSH-Px activities of liver, kidney and pancreas were higher (p<0.05) in the SS group than those in the D-Se-Met group; but no differences were detected with respect to GSH-Px activities in serum and tissues between the SS and L-Se-Met groups ( Table 4). The results were consistent with those of Zhan et al [9], Payne and Southern [33] and Jiang et al [34]. The lower GSH-Px activity in broilers fed Se-Met diet compared broilers fed SS diet are probably because that Se, regardless Values are means±SE, n=5.…”

Section: Selenomethionine Treatments Versus Sodium Selenitesupporting

confidence: 91%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of Different Forms of Dietary Selenium Supplementation on Growth Performance, Meat Quality, Selenium Deposition, and Antioxidant Property in Broilers

Wang

Zhan

Zhang

et al. 2010

Biol Trace Elem Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of different sources of dietary selenium (Se) supplementation on growth performance, meat quality, Se deposition, and antioxidant property in broilers. A total of 600 one-day-old Ross 308 broilers with an average body weight (BW) of 44.30 ± 0.49 g were randomly allotted to three treatments, each of which included five replicates of 40 birds. These three groups received the same basal diet containing 0.04 mg Se/kg, supplemented with 0.15 mg Se/kg from sodium selenite (SS) or from L-selenomethionine (L-Se-methionine (Met)) or from D-selenomethionine (D-Se-Met). The experiment lasted 42 days. Both Se source and time significantly influenced (p < 0.01) drip loss of breast muscle. Supplementation with L-Se-Met and D-Se-Met were more effective (p < 0.05) in decreasing drip loss than SS. Besides, the pH value of breast muscle was also significantly influenced (p < 0.05) by time. The SS-supplemented diet increased more (p < 0.05) liver, kidney, and pancreas glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities than the D-Se-Met-supplemented diet. In addition, L-Se-Met increased more (p < 0.01) liver and pancreas GSH-Px activities than D-Se-Met. The antioxidant status was greatly improved in broilers of L-Se-Met-treated group in comparison with the SS-treated group and was illuminated by the increased glutathione (GSH) concentration in serum, liver, and breast muscle (p < 0.05); superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in liver (p < 0.01); total antioxidant capability (T-AOC) in kidney, pancreas, and breast muscle (p < 0.05) and decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration in kidney and breast muscle (p < 0.05) of broilers. Besides, supplementation with D-Se-Met was more effective (p < 0.01) in increasing serum GSH concentration and decreasing breast muscle MDA concentration than SS. L-Selenomethionine supplementation significantly increased GSH concentration in liver and breast muscle (p < 0.05); SOD activity in liver (p < 0.01); and T-AOC in liver, pancreas, and breast muscle (p < 0.05) of broilers, compared with broilers fed D-Se-Met diet. The addition of L-Se-Met and D-Se-Met increased (p < 0.01) Se concentration in serum and different organs studied of broilers in comparision with broilers fed SS diet. Therefore, dietary L-Se-Met and D-Se-Met supplementation could improve antioxidant capability and Se deposition in serum and tissues and reduce drip loss of breast muscle in broilers compared with SS. Besides, L-Se-Met is more effective than D-Se-Met in improving antioxidant status in broilers.

show abstract

Section: Selenomethionine Treatments Versus Sodium Selenitesupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Selenomethionine Treatments Versus Sodium Selenitesupporting

confidence: 91%

Comparison of Different Forms of Dietary Selenium Supplementation on Growth Performance, Meat Quality, Selenium Deposition, and Antioxidant Property in Broilers

Wang

Zhan

Zhang

et al. 2010

Biol Trace Elem Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Our particular interest is the potential regulation of TrxR1, SelP, and SelW in broilers by Se supplementing due to their potential relevance to antioxidant defense mechanisms. It was reported that organic Se was more effective in increasing antioxidant property than inorganic Se (Mahan and Parrett 1996;Payne and Southern 2005;Jiang et al 2009;Wang et al 2011a, c). However, data from the present study indicated that the SS supplemented diet increased more serum (P < 0.05) and liver (P < 0.01) SelP concentrations as well as liver (P < 0.01) and kidney (P < 0.01) TrxR1 activities than the d-Se-Met supplemented diet; while the activity of liver and kidney TrxR1 was significantly (P < 0.01) lower in the l-Se-Met-supplemented group than in the SS-supplemented group (Tables 3 and 4).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Comparison of different forms of dietary selenium supplementation on gene expression of cytoplasmic thioredoxin reductase, selenoprotein P, and selenoprotein W in broilers

Zhan¹,

Wang²,

Yuan³

et al. 2014

Czech J. Anim. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:Effects of different forms of dietary selenium (Se) supplementation on gene expression of cytoplasmic thioredoxin reductase (TrxR1), selenoprotein P (SelP), and selenoprotein W (SelW) in broilers were investigated. A total of six hundred Ross 308 broilers (1-day-old) with similar body weight were randomly divided into three groups, each of which included 5 replicates of 40 birds. These three treatments received the same basal diet with only background Se level of 0.04 mg Se/kg, supplemented with 0.15 mg Se/kg as sodium selenite (SS) or l-selenomethionine (l-Se-Met) or d-selenomethionine (d-Se-Met) for 42 days. The SS supplemented diet increased TrxR1 activity in liver (P < 0.01) and kidney (P < 0.01) as well as SelP concentration in serum (P < 0.05) and liver (P < 0.01) more than the d-Se-Met supplemented diet. The addition of SS also highly increased liver (P < 0.01) and kidney (P < 0.01) TrxR1 activities of broilers in comparison with broilers fed l-Se-Met diet. In addition, liver TrxR1 activity in l-Se-Met group was higher than that in d-Se-Met group (P < 0.05). Liver and kidney mRNA levels of TrxR1 and SelP as well as breast muscle SelW mRNA level were significantly increased by l-and d-Se-Met supplementation in comparison with SS supplementation (P < 0.01), while the d-Se-Met group showed more effective (P < 0.01) than the l-Se-Met group in increasing the mRNA levels of TrxR1 and SelP in liver and kidney. Therefore, dietary l-Se-Met and d-Se-Met supplementation could improve mRNA levels of different selenoproteins studied and reduce amounts of TrxR1 and SelP in broilers compared with SS. Besides, l-Se-Met is more effective than d-Se-Met in raising TrxR1 activity and decreasing mRNA abundance of TrxR1 and SelP in broilers.

show abstract

“…In fact, the activities of serum GSH-Px, SOD and total antioxidant capacity were significantly higher in selenium yeast than sodium selenite-fed chickens [102]. Similarly, dietary Se-Met significantly elevated T-AOC, GPX, T-SOD, CAT activities, contents of GSH and reduced carbonyl protein content in chicken breast muscle [103]. It was shown that dietary organic Se significantly increased the Se content and the activities of CAT and SOD, but decreased the MDA content in chicken breast muscle at 42 days of age [104].…”

Section: Seleniummentioning

confidence: 91%

Antioxidant Systems in Poultry Biology: Superoxide Dismutase

Surai¹

2016

J Anim Res Nutr

159

135

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Commercial poultry production is associated with various stresses responsible for decreasing productive and reproductive performance of growing chicks, breeders and commercial layers. A growing body of evidence shows that most of stresses in poultry production at the cellular level are associated with oxidative stress. Recently, a concept of the cellular antioxidant defense has been revised with special attention paid to cellular redox status maintenance and cell signaling. In fact, antioxidant systems of the living cell are based on three major levels of defense and superoxide dismutase (SOD) is shown to belong to the first level of the antioxidant defense network. Cellular antioxidant defenses are shown to include several options and vitagene activation in stress conditions is considered as a fundamental adaptive mechanism. The vitagene family includes various genes regulating synthesis of protective molecules including thioredoxins, sirtuins, heat shock proteins and SOD. However, by the time of writing no comprehensive review on the roles and effects of SOD in poultry biology has appeared. Therefore, the aim of this review is a critical analysis of the role of SOD in poultry biology with specific emphasis to its functions as an essential part of the vitagene network. From the analysis of the recent data related to SOD in poultry physiology and adaptation to stresses it is possible to conclude that: a) SOD as important vitagene is the main driving force in cell/body adaptation to various stress conditions. Indeed, in stress conditions additional synthesis of SOD is an adaptive mechanism to decrease ROS formation; b) If the stress is too high SOD activity is decreased and apoptosis is activated; c) there are tissue-specific differences in SOD expression which also depends on the strength of such stress-factors as heat, heavy metals, mycotoxins and other stressors; d) SOD is shown to provide an effective protection against lipid peroxidation in chicken embryonic tissues and semen; e) SOD is shown to be protective in heat and cold stress, toxicity stress as well as in other oxidative-stress related conditions in poultry production; f) there are complex interactions inside the antioxidant network of the cell/body to ensure an effective maintenance of homeostasis in stress conditions. Indeed, in many cases, nutritional antioxidants (vitamin E, selenium, carotenoids, phytochemicals, etc.) in the feed can increase SOD expression; g) nutritional means of SOD upregulation in stress conditions of poultry production and physiological and commercial consequences await further investigation; h) vitagene upregulation in stress conditions is emerging as an effective means for stress management.

show abstract

Effects of Dietary Selenomethionine Supplementation on Growth Performance, Meat Quality and Antioxidant Property in Yellow Broilers

Cited by 96 publications

References 25 publications

Comparison of Different Forms of Dietary Selenium Supplementation on Growth Performance, Meat Quality, Selenium Deposition, and Antioxidant Property in Broilers

Comparison of Different Forms of Dietary Selenium Supplementation on Growth Performance, Meat Quality, Selenium Deposition, and Antioxidant Property in Broilers

Comparison of different forms of dietary selenium supplementation on gene expression of cytoplasmic thioredoxin reductase, selenoprotein P, and selenoprotein W in broilers

Antioxidant Systems in Poultry Biology: Superoxide Dismutase

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About