2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.02113.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dietary protein and lipid levels on growth performance and body composition of black sea bassCentropristis striata(Linnaeus 1758) during grow-out in a pilot-scale marine recirculating system

Abstract: The in£uence of four formulated practical diets, with di¡erent protein and lipid levels, on the growth and body composition of black sea bass (Centropristis striata L.) pre-adults was evaluated in a pilot-scale marine recirculating system. Four test diets were prepared with a combination of two protein levels (44% and 54%) and two lipid levels (10% and 15%). The diets were as follows: low protein and low lipid (LP:LL; 44:10), low protein and high lipid (LP:HL; 44:15), high protein and low lipid (HP:LL; 54:10) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
15
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction of growth performance of Malaysian mahseer with increasing dietary lipid was in agreement with the latter group of farmed freshwater species. As shown in earlier studies (Satpathy et al 2003;Hamre et al 2004;Alam et al 2009a), this study also revealed that FCR decreased with increasing dietary lipid. It is well established that fish adjust their feed intake to meet their digestible energy requirements .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The reduction of growth performance of Malaysian mahseer with increasing dietary lipid was in agreement with the latter group of farmed freshwater species. As shown in earlier studies (Satpathy et al 2003;Hamre et al 2004;Alam et al 2009a), this study also revealed that FCR decreased with increasing dietary lipid. It is well established that fish adjust their feed intake to meet their digestible energy requirements .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The protein sparing effect of lipid has been reported in many fish species (Schulz et al., 2007; for pike perch, Sander lucioperca ; Alam et al., 2009; for black sea bass, Centropristis striata ; Biswas et al., 2009; for Pacific blue fin tuna, T. orientalis ; and Liu et al., 2011; for Asian catfish, Pangasius hypophthalmus ). Generally, protein sparing effect is observed by concomitant decrease in dietary protein and increase in dietary lipid and is more pronounced at the sub‐optimum level of dietary protein and higher level of lipid (Tibbetts et al., 2005; Mohanta et al., 2007; Schulz et al., 2007), which is not the case in the present study as the best growth and nutrient utilization of blue gourami were recorded in the medium dietary protein (350 g/kg) and lipid (80 g/kg) diet and not in the low‐protein and high‐lipid diet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The trend of increasing weight gain, SGR, PER, PRE and ERE and decreasing FCR with increase in dietary lipid (individual effect) up to certain level and then no improvement in these parameters with further rise in dietary lipid level as observed in the present study is in agreement with the earlier studies in Tilapia aurea (Stickney and McGeachin, 1983), Heteropneustes fossilis (Anwar and Jafri, 1995), Cirrhinus mrigala (Jafri et al., 1995), Oreochromis niloticus × O. aureus (Chou and Shiau, 1996), Rhamdia quelen (Salhi et al., 2004) and M. amblycephala (Li et al., 2010). It is reported that within certain limits, increasing the dietary lipid improves feed efficiency and diet utilization in fish (Peres and Oliva‐Teles, 1999; McGoogan and Gatlin, 1999; Alam et al., 2009). But excess lipid not only suppresses de novo fatty acid synthesis but also reduces the ability of fish to digest and assimilate it, leading to reduced growth rate (Sargent et al., 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Core gut microbial composition of 12 smallmouth grunt ( H. chrysargyreum ) exposed to four experimental feeds ( N  = 3 per feed) used to test KnipBio single cell protein (KnipBio meal; KBM) as a fishmeal substitute, where GRU-C1m GRU nt C ontrol feed (modelled after Alam et al, 2012; Alam, Watanabe & Carroll, 2008; Alam et al, 2009), GRU-C2, GRU-C1 with 80 ppm carotenoid addition, and GRU-KL and GRU-KH are control feed with fishmeal replaced with KBM; KL, K nipBio meal L ow (10% replacement) and KH, K nipBio meal H igh (50% replacement). Numbers above bars indicate the proportion of the microbiome represented by the six core groups ( N  = 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%