2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-635x2011000100005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dietary calcium levels and limestone particicle size on the performance, tibia and blood of laying hens

Abstract: A total of 405 23-week-old ISA ® Brown layers were distributed in a completely randomized experimental design in a factorial arrangement with nine treatments consisting of three dietary calcium levels (3.5, 3.75, and 4.5%) and three limestone particle sizes (100% fine limestone (FL), 70% FL + 30% coarse limestone (CL) and 50% (FL) + 50% (CL)), with nine replicates of five birds per cage. The following parameters were evaluated: percentage of lay, defective eggs, egg weight, egg mass, feed intake, feed conversi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Feed intake was not influenced (p>0.05) by dietary clinoptilolite or calcium levels. Consistent and contradictory results have been reported in literature (Nakaue e Koelliker, 1981;Roland, 1988;Roland et al, 1991;Frost et al, 1992;Shariatmadari, 2008;Pelícia et al, 2011). The reported differences may be due to the use of different layer genetic strains as well as different Table 2 -Egg production (EP), intact eggs (IE), egg weight (EW), egg mass (EM), feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio per dozen eggs (FCR/dz) and per kg eggs (FCR/kg) of layers fed diets with different clinoptilolite (CLINO) and calcium (Ca) levels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Feed intake was not influenced (p>0.05) by dietary clinoptilolite or calcium levels. Consistent and contradictory results have been reported in literature (Nakaue e Koelliker, 1981;Roland, 1988;Roland et al, 1991;Frost et al, 1992;Shariatmadari, 2008;Pelícia et al, 2011). The reported differences may be due to the use of different layer genetic strains as well as different Table 2 -Egg production (EP), intact eggs (IE), egg weight (EW), egg mass (EM), feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio per dozen eggs (FCR/dz) and per kg eggs (FCR/kg) of layers fed diets with different clinoptilolite (CLINO) and calcium (Ca) levels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Feed intake was not influenced (p>0.05) by dietary clinoptilolite or calcium levels. Reviewing the literature, there are different and consistent results relative to our findings (Nakaue & Koelliker, 1981;Roland, 1988;Roland et al, 1991;Frost et al, 1992;Shariatmadari, 2008;Pelícia et al, 2011). The contradictory literature reports may be due to the use of different layer genetic strains as well as different zeolite and calcium levels and sources applied in the diets.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…Based on feed intake, it was calculated that calcium intake ranged between 2.96g/hen/day for layers fed the lowest calcium level and 4.34g/bird/day for those fed the highest level. Pelícia et al (2011), working with 3.0-4.5% calcium levels in semi-heavy layer diets at the end of the first laying cycle, also did not observed any differences in calcium blood level, although calcium intake linearly Berto dA, Garcia EA, Vercese F, Santos GC dos, Barreiro FR, Molino A de B, Pelícia K, Silveira AF da…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Low dietary Ca levels for laying poultry affect egg production and are an issue that is recognized by researchers [21,22]. Some research has also stated that a high Ca diet of 5% has no effect on egg production [23], while other studies have shown that high dietary Ca inhibits egg production in laying hens [12,24]. Based on our study, we hypothesize that too high or too low levels of dietary Ca will both affect egg production and that the optimal dietary Ca level is 1.23%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%