1973
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4835(73)90220-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of detergents on the ionic balance and permeability of isolated bovine cornea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resazurin has been used since the 1950s to assess bacterial or yeast contamination in biological fluids (8) and it is also used to measure the viability of sperm by colorimetry (9). It has been commercialized since 1993 as Alamar blue dye (10) as a viability cell test and has been assessed several times on different types of cells for its cytotoxicity reliability, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resazurin has been used since the 1950s to assess bacterial or yeast contamination in biological fluids (8) and it is also used to measure the viability of sperm by colorimetry (9). It has been commercialized since 1993 as Alamar blue dye (10) as a viability cell test and has been assessed several times on different types of cells for its cytotoxicity reliability, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some materials shown to cause TASS include endotoxin; denatured ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs); preservative and stabilizing agents; heavy metals; residue left behind by substances used during the cleaning and sterilization of instruments; intraocular medications at toxic doses; irrigating solutions with incorrect pH, osmolarity, or ionic composition; and retained OVD or lens cortical material. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] In February 2006, the number of TASS cases reported to the Intermountain Ocular Research Center at the University of Utah, the TASS Center at Emory University, and industry representatives increased significantly. This led to the establishment of an ad hoc TASS Task Force, with funding from the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS), for investigating this outbreak and assisting surgical sites in evaluating their risk for TASS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our view, enzymatic detergents should not be used because they have exhibited toxicity to the corneal endothelium in human and animal studies and have been implicated as a source of TASS when incompletely rinsed from the instruments before sterilization. 6,7,12 The enzymes are not deactivated by autoclave sterilization. Furthermore, enzymatic detergents are intended to remove bulk biomaterial from surgical instruments; however, ophthalmic anterior segment instruments acquire little bioburden during surgery and the material they do collect is completely removed with adequate manual cleaning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 10 , 16 Enzymatic detergents have some exotoxins that cannot be deactivated by autoclaves, which is why they should not be used for decontamination of the instruments. 9 , 17 , 18 Ultrasound baths may be colonized with Gram-negative bacteria producing endotoxins that are heat-stable and cannot be deactivated by autoclaves. The instruments can take these endotoxins from a contaminated ultrasonic bath, and thus may cause TASS after entrance into the anterior chamber.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%