2012
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.85.036109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of degree-biased transmission rate and nonlinear infectivity on rumor spreading in complex social networks

Abstract: We introduce a generalized rumor spreading model and analytically investigate the spreading of rumors on scale-free (SF) networks. In the standard rumor spreading model, each node has an infectivity equal to its degree, and connectivity is uniform across all links. To generalize this model, we introduce an infectivity function that determines the number of simultaneous contacts that a given node (individual) may establish with its connected neighbors and a connectivity strength function (CSF) for the direct li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical studies that started about two decades ago fully indicate that most realistic OSNs are heterogeneous rather than homogeneous [20,21]. In the past decade, therefore, much efforts were focused on rumor spreading models based on complex networks [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. However, it is uncertain whether these models accurately characterize actual rumor spreading processes, because the models are derived through a series of approximations and do not perfectly accommodate the spreading network [38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical studies that started about two decades ago fully indicate that most realistic OSNs are heterogeneous rather than homogeneous [20,21]. In the past decade, therefore, much efforts were focused on rumor spreading models based on complex networks [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. However, it is uncertain whether these models accurately characterize actual rumor spreading processes, because the models are derived through a series of approximations and do not perfectly accommodate the spreading network [38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) Improvements on the previous rumor propagation models. The deterministic epidemiclike rumor propagation models proposed for online social networks in the majority of existing literatures are mainly based on ODE [24,30,35,42,45], which deals only with collective social processes over time without considering space factors for mobile online social networks. Though some researchers recently have begun to study both temporal and spatial patterns of information diffusion in social media by PDE [31,32,51], they may ignore the spatial-temporal delay phenomenon in information transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, distinguishing the sensitivity of these parameters is significant for understanding the mechanism of rumor propagation in online social networks. However, in most of the previous literatures, scholars randomly selected a parameter and then varied the values of this parameter to give a numerical simulation about their proposed models [23,24,44,45]. In this work, by applying sensitivity analysis in mathematics, we study the relationship between the density of spreading users and the parameters in our proposed model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other scholars have studied rumor propagation by considering the topological properties of social networks [13][14][15][16]. Zanette [17,18] and Buzna et al [19] studied the dynamic process of rumor propagation and found that there was a critical rumor-propagation threshold that must be exceeded before a rumor can propagate in small-world networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%