53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference<BR&amp;gt;20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adapti 2012
DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-1420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Defects: Part A - Development of a Protocol for Defect Risk Management & Improved Reliability of Composite Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be noted that this same equation is utilized for both tensile and compressive cases and the associated material properties are changed for each case (Table 1). While the fiber-matrix compression damage case appears to only be necessary in compression loading cases, given the geometries this failure criteria was utilized in both tensile and compressive cases: (6) where σ 11,C and S 11,C are fiber compressive stress and strength, respectively. Finally, two different equations are utilized depending on whether fiber failure is in tension or compression, respectively: (8) where ε 11,T and 11,T are calculated and ultimate tensile strain, respectively.…”
Section: Table 3 Progressive Damage Outline and Degradation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It must be noted that this same equation is utilized for both tensile and compressive cases and the associated material properties are changed for each case (Table 1). While the fiber-matrix compression damage case appears to only be necessary in compression loading cases, given the geometries this failure criteria was utilized in both tensile and compressive cases: (6) where σ 11,C and S 11,C are fiber compressive stress and strength, respectively. Finally, two different equations are utilized depending on whether fiber failure is in tension or compression, respectively: (8) where ε 11,T and 11,T are calculated and ultimate tensile strain, respectively.…”
Section: Table 3 Progressive Damage Outline and Degradation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, research specific to understand the criticality of defects common to blades is necessary and coupon level, benchmark testing was performed by the MSUCG. [4][5][6][7][8][9] The prior benchmark material testing (BMT) was performed to establish and understand the material properties, failure points and modes, and damage progression of both unflawed and flawed specimens. For example, it was clearly evident that once a flaw was introduced, the material response in the flawed area dominated the overall response in most cases as indicated by the review of digital image correlation data as seen in Figure 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has shown the utility of quantifying the influence of defects in composite laminates (Riddle et al, 2013;Dowling, 2012;Samborsky et al, 2012;Nijssen, 2011;Lin and Styart, 2007). Furthermore, a probabilistic design approach may be implemented, but has not been adopted as the common approach for wind turbine certification (FAA AC 25.571-1D, 2011).…”
Section: Model Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the MSUCG has divided this effort into two distinct tasks: Part A-Flaw Characterization, and Part B-Effects of Defects. [5][6][7][8] The function of the Flaw Characterization effort has been to provide quantitative analysis for two major directives: (1) acquisition and generation of quantitative flaw data for use in the Effects of Defects numerical modeling program; and, (2) development of a flaw severity designation system and probabilistic risk management protocol for as-built flawed structures. The Effects of Defects portion is focused on the development of modeling capabilities to predict the damage progression and structural implications of common flaws found in composite wind turbine blades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 These results were then utilized to build simple analytical models with the purpose of performing laminate analysis with included defects in a coordinated effort with the Flaw Characterization task. 5,7 An understanding of the changes in the material properties associated with characterized flaws was achieved on a coupon level with physical testing being performed with several configurations of each of the different flaw types. This testing clearly indicated that fiber misalignment and porosity resulted in degraded material properties and decreased material performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%