2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of chopping grass silage and mixing silage with concentrate on feed intake, dietary selection, chewing activity and faecal particle size of ewes in late pregnancy and early lactation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible cause to this discrepancy is that the relatively high dietary crude fat concentrations in Y1 might have had a more negative effect on the more mature fibre in the late-harvested maize than on the immature fibre in the early-harvested maize, with this negative effect not occurring in Y2 when the fat concentrations in the diets were lower. The NDFI in relation to BW in our study was similar to that found in some earlier studies with sheep fed large proportions of forage (Fraser et al, 2000, Jalali et al, 2012 but lower than in other studies (Helander et al, 2014a(Helander et al, , 2014b. The NDFI in relation to BW obtained in the present study was considered sufficient for enabling a functional rumen, and well above the lower limit of the equivalence of 2% straw in concentrate-based diets, as suggested by Weston (1974).…”
Section: Effects Of Maize Maturity Stage At Harvestsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A possible cause to this discrepancy is that the relatively high dietary crude fat concentrations in Y1 might have had a more negative effect on the more mature fibre in the late-harvested maize than on the immature fibre in the early-harvested maize, with this negative effect not occurring in Y2 when the fat concentrations in the diets were lower. The NDFI in relation to BW in our study was similar to that found in some earlier studies with sheep fed large proportions of forage (Fraser et al, 2000, Jalali et al, 2012 but lower than in other studies (Helander et al, 2014a(Helander et al, , 2014b. The NDFI in relation to BW obtained in the present study was considered sufficient for enabling a functional rumen, and well above the lower limit of the equivalence of 2% straw in concentrate-based diets, as suggested by Weston (1974).…”
Section: Effects Of Maize Maturity Stage At Harvestsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The lactating ewes fed the LFV silage clearly sought to increase their MEI by sorting for the most digestible parts of the silage, as shown in this experiment with higher concentrations of ME and CP in the silage offered than in the refused silage. Sorting for the most nutritious and digestible parts of the forage by sheep has previously been shown (Bernes et al ., ; Helander et al ., ) and the sorting is more extensive in unchopped forage compared to chopped forage, as was also shown recently by Helander et al . ().…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Sorting for the most nutritious and digestible parts of the forage by sheep has previously been shown (Bernes et al ., ; Helander et al ., ) and the sorting is more extensive in unchopped forage compared to chopped forage, as was also shown recently by Helander et al . (). It needs to be considered that some of the silage fed to the ewes during lactation was consumed by the lambs and this was considered equal over treatments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The size distribution of forage particles that pass through the reticulo-omasal sphincter has not been studied in free-ranging white-tailed deer. In domestic sheep, fecal particle size is not constant but varies with reproductive state and diet (Helander et al 2014). A small particle size for an animal consuming a predominantly opuntia diet, for example, might not be the same as small particle sizes for animals consuming a predominantly leafy browse and acorn diet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%