2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of biocrust on soil erosion and organic carbon losses under natural rainfall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
67
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(100 reference statements)
3
67
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This increase was higher in soil under plants receiving run‐on from upslope biocrust areas than in soil under plants excluded from this water supply and receiving only rainfall (Figure ), suggesting that increased water availability provided by run‐on also exerts a positive effect on roots and microbial activity, as do increases in precipitation (Shen, Reynolds, & Hui, ). The positive effect of water supplied by run‐on on soil biological activity along with the expected nutrient redistribution from biocrusted open spaces through runoff generation (Barger et al, ; Cantón et al, ; Chamizo et al, ) could be the main reasons explaining the higher TOC and DOC observed in soil below open M. tenacissima plants at the end of the experiment (Table ). This enriched organic carbon pool may enhance microbial activity, contributing to increasing CO 2 released from soil (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This increase was higher in soil under plants receiving run‐on from upslope biocrust areas than in soil under plants excluded from this water supply and receiving only rainfall (Figure ), suggesting that increased water availability provided by run‐on also exerts a positive effect on roots and microbial activity, as do increases in precipitation (Shen, Reynolds, & Hui, ). The positive effect of water supplied by run‐on on soil biological activity along with the expected nutrient redistribution from biocrusted open spaces through runoff generation (Barger et al, ; Cantón et al, ; Chamizo et al, ) could be the main reasons explaining the higher TOC and DOC observed in soil below open M. tenacissima plants at the end of the experiment (Table ). This enriched organic carbon pool may enhance microbial activity, contributing to increasing CO 2 released from soil (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, biocrust communities are able to take advantage of small rain pulses, unproductive for vascular plants, fixing large amounts of C and N, which are incorporated into the soil profile (Belnap et al, ). These soil nutrients may be partially redistributed to downslope vegetation through runoff during later heavier, more intense rainfall (Belnap et al, ; Barger et al, 2005; Cantón et al, ; Chamizo et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young soils from upper hillslope positions (both N and S-slopes), with less infiltration and salt leaching, show larger amounts of gypsum and high EC (Table S1; Cantón et al, 2003). By occupying these positions, lichen-dominated biocrusts act as runoff sources, promoting the redistribution of water along the hillslope to the pediments (Rodríguez- Caballero et al, 2014bCaballero et al, , 2015 and acting as a water and nutrient surplus that increases vegetation growth and productivity (Chamizo et al, 2017;Rodríguez-Caballero et al, 2018b). As solar radiation directly influences water evaporation, when insolation decreased, cyanobacteria-dominated biocrust cover was replaced by lichens (Figure 4), which represented the dominant surface component on N-slopes and the main biocrust type on old N-slopes ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the main growth constraints for dryland plants are shallow and poorly developed soils, scarce precipitation and high potential evapotranspiration rates (Noy-Meir, 1973). Biocrusts reduce water and wind erosion (Belnap et al, 2014;Chamizo et al, 2017), while acting as a sustainable source of runoff water and nutrients to downstream vegetation (Barger et al, 2006;Li et al, 2008;Cantón et al, 2014;Rodríguez-Caballero et al, 2015, 2018bZhuang et al, 2015;Chamizo et al, 2017). Spatial distribution of the landscape components depends on local water-biomass feedback (Bonachela et al, 2015) and on how abiotic factors, such as geological, geomorphological and pedological properties, modify resource availability and microclimate (Greig-Smith, 1979;Yair and Shachak, 1982;Monger and Bestelmeyer, 2006;Peters and Havstad, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the most extreme climate regions, biocrusts are only composed of the microscopic constituents, but as aridity decreases, macroscopic lichens, mosses and liverworts become more prevalent (Bowker et al ., ). They are involved in many important ecosystem processes, including carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling (Evans & Lange, ; Hu et al ., ; Barger et al ., ; Sancho et al ., ), surface energy balance (Rodríguez‐Caballero et al ., ; Couradeau et al ., ; Rutherford et al ., ), erosion (Zhao & Xu, ; Cantón et al ., ; Chamizo et al ., ) and water redistribution (Bowker et al ., ; Kidron & Büdel, ; Chamizo et al ., ), to name but a few. Biocrusts have also been found to modulate the magnitude of responses of C and N cycling to climate change in experimental studies (Maestre et al ., ; Delgado‐Baquerizo et al ., ; Hu et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%