2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2006.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of baclofen on operant performance for food pellets and vegetable shortening after a history of binge-type behavior in non-food deprived rats

Abstract: Operant performance of non-food deprived rats (n=8) was assessed under progressive ratio (PR) and concurrent PR-fixed ratio schedules of food pellet and/or vegetable shortening reinforcement. Post operant baselines, rats were matched and divided into 2 groups based upon the schedule of shortening availability: High restriction binge group (H, 1-hr home cage shortening access each week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday) and Low restriction (L, 1-hr shortening access daily). Chow and water were continuously avail… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
63
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
9
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that same study, the D 1 antagonist SCH23390 had no effect on consumption of the high-fat chow. Finally, recent work using our limited access binge protocol indicates that SCH23390 only reduces intake of 100% shortening at dosages that also suppress intake of chow (Corwin and Wojnicki, 2006). This indicates that the intake reductions were due to nonspecific motor impairment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In that same study, the D 1 antagonist SCH23390 had no effect on consumption of the high-fat chow. Finally, recent work using our limited access binge protocol indicates that SCH23390 only reduces intake of 100% shortening at dosages that also suppress intake of chow (Corwin and Wojnicki, 2006). This indicates that the intake reductions were due to nonspecific motor impairment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This indicates that the intake reductions were due to nonspecific motor impairment. In contrast, raclopride had more fat-specific effects (Corwin and Wojnicki, 2006). Taken together, the available evidence indicates that fat intake can be modulated by peripheral injections of D 2 , but not D 1 , receptor antagonists, and that these effects are not explained by generalized motor disruption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations