1977
DOI: 10.1080/03015521.1977.10425948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of anthelmintics on dairy cow yields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in DecemberMarch. It may also be significant that McQueen et at (17) found that the effects of anthelmintics on milk yields were most pronounced during the second half of lactation (Dec. Most clinical cases of type II ostertagiasis in this country occur in the winter and spring, but it is suggested that subclinical losses in meat and milk production are more likely to occur in the autumn.…”
Section: Epidemiology and Incidence Related To Locality And Climatementioning
confidence: 86%
“…in DecemberMarch. It may also be significant that McQueen et at (17) found that the effects of anthelmintics on milk yields were most pronounced during the second half of lactation (Dec. Most clinical cases of type II ostertagiasis in this country occur in the winter and spring, but it is suggested that subclinical losses in meat and milk production are more likely to occur in the autumn.…”
Section: Epidemiology and Incidence Related To Locality And Climatementioning
confidence: 86%
“…For seasonal control, environmental contamination must be minimised to prevent continued reinfection 10. The existence of infective larvae in the surroundings of cattle is even more damaging than their development within the cattle 11. Cattle have to give up something in terms of production in order to fight parasitic infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this previous study, cows were treated with eprinomectin, a persistent-activity product which prevents from re-infection with Ostertagia for 28 days [ 52 ]; and MP was followed for only 4 weeks after treatment, a period over which cows could therefore not be re-infected. The same was true in studies where several treatments were applied repeatedly on lactating cows during the grazing season [ 23 , 39 , 40 ]: positive effects of these repeated treatment strategies on MP were mainly reported but with highly limited post-treatment reinfections during the period of follow-up. On the contrary, in our study, treated cows could be re-infected during the 105 days period of follow up after the non-persistent fenbendazole treatment, because they kept grazing together with control cows on pastures where parasitic cycles had been re-initiated for 1.5 to 2 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Only one study reported a positive effect of a single treatment applied 1.5 months after turn out [ 38 ], but this study was conducted with a small sample size (40 cows in one herd). In a few other studies, several treatments were applied repeatedly on lactating cows during the grazing season, with a positive or a non-significant effect on MP [ 23 , 39 , 40 ]. But this whole herd repeated-treatment strategy is of course questionable if we keep in mind the need to preserve a large population of parasites in refugia .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%