2017
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpx005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of alternative establishment systems on resource availability, understorey composition and tree performance in juvenile hybrid poplar plantations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with the findings by Davies (1988) and Thomas et al (2001). Greater benefits at that time would be afforded by concentrating weed control on the suppression of vegetation immediately surrounding the stems of newly planted poplar trees, either through more intensive initial weed control before planting (Goehing et al 2017) or by within-row control after planting, being careful to ensure that there is no transfer of herbicide to the main stem. In contrast, results from the third and fourth year of monitoring showed that removal of above-and below-ground vegetation close to the tree stem did not result in the greatest tree performance; instead, tree growth was maximized when aboveground vegetation was controlled out to a distance of 140 cm from the stem.…”
Section: Vegetation (%) In 2012supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This agrees with the findings by Davies (1988) and Thomas et al (2001). Greater benefits at that time would be afforded by concentrating weed control on the suppression of vegetation immediately surrounding the stems of newly planted poplar trees, either through more intensive initial weed control before planting (Goehing et al 2017) or by within-row control after planting, being careful to ensure that there is no transfer of herbicide to the main stem. In contrast, results from the third and fourth year of monitoring showed that removal of above-and below-ground vegetation close to the tree stem did not result in the greatest tree performance; instead, tree growth was maximized when aboveground vegetation was controlled out to a distance of 140 cm from the stem.…”
Section: Vegetation (%) In 2012supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The handheld weed trimmer that we used was better able to control near-stem vegetation than would conventional mowing treatments with operational-sized equipment (e.g., tow-behind mowers) (e.g., Coll et al 2007). Results from our study highlight the need to test innovative complementary weed control practices, with a special emphasis on developing effective near-stem weed control in the early establishment and growth phase and (or) improved weed control in the year prior to plantation establishment (Goehing et al 2017).…”
Section: Vegetation (%) In 2012mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Two related poplar clones, widely planted across the Canadian Prairies, the female clone 'Walker ' (Populus deltoides × (P. laurifolia × P. nigra)) (Lindquist et al 1977) and male progeny clone 'Okanese' ('Walker' × (P. laurifolia × P. nigra)) (Schroeder et al 2013) were used as reference clones. Both clones are of economic importance in shelterbelts and, more recently, in short rotation intensive crop (SRIC) plantations (Goehing et al 2017). In spring 2008, over-winter dormant stock that had been rooted the previous summer in a commercial greenhouse was planted following a randomized complete block design, with one ramet per clone in each of four blocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears that in the face of climate change, all efforts related to increasing WUE in selection programs need to be combined with the intended cultural practices designed to improve WUE at the plantation level. This set of silvicultural techniques often include: site preparation prior to planting, weed control during the establishment phase of the plantation [56,57], fertilization, use of mycorrhizae, thinning, and plantation density [58]. Most of these techniques are designed to reduce competition for soil and water resources and improve root growth conditions and/or water uptake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%