2018
DOI: 10.1111/acel.12829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of aging on liver microcirculatory function and sinusoidal phenotype

Abstract: The socioeconomic and medical improvements of the last decades have led to a relevant increase in the median age of worldwide population. Although numerous studies described the impact of aging in different organs and the systemic vasculature, relatively little is known about liver function and hepatic microcirculatory status in the elderly. In this study, we aimed at characterizing the phenotype of the aged liver in a rat model of healthy aging, particularly focusing on the microcirculatory function and the m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
149
1
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
149
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…That is why we validated the phenotype of the four cell types obtained after this procedure, both with molecular markers and functional assays to determine their ability to respond to stimuli. Indeed, hepatocytes produced albumin and urea, LSEC displayed characteristic fenestrae and sinusoidal Ac‐LDL endocytosis, HMΦ responded to LPS stimulation, especially those isolated from Ch animals, which is in accordance with recent in vivo data on acute on chronic liver failure, and HSC expressed their characteristic activation marker α‐SMA. In addition, cells isolated from cirrhotic livers exhibited a phenotype that matched their pathologic situation (hepatocytes: reduced albumin synthesis, LSEC: lack of fenestrae, HMΦ: inflammatory hyperesponse, HSC: increased α‐SMA expression) suggesting that, unlike other protocols where selection is based on surface markers that may change during cirrhosis (CD31, CD32b) our protocol is phenotype‐unbiased and thus suitable for the study of different models of CLD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is why we validated the phenotype of the four cell types obtained after this procedure, both with molecular markers and functional assays to determine their ability to respond to stimuli. Indeed, hepatocytes produced albumin and urea, LSEC displayed characteristic fenestrae and sinusoidal Ac‐LDL endocytosis, HMΦ responded to LPS stimulation, especially those isolated from Ch animals, which is in accordance with recent in vivo data on acute on chronic liver failure, and HSC expressed their characteristic activation marker α‐SMA. In addition, cells isolated from cirrhotic livers exhibited a phenotype that matched their pathologic situation (hepatocytes: reduced albumin synthesis, LSEC: lack of fenestrae, HMΦ: inflammatory hyperesponse, HSC: increased α‐SMA expression) suggesting that, unlike other protocols where selection is based on surface markers that may change during cirrhosis (CD31, CD32b) our protocol is phenotype‐unbiased and thus suitable for the study of different models of CLD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…P-value ≤0.05 vs Ct; @ P-value ≤0.05 vs 250.000; *P-value ≤0.05 vs Veh determine their ability to respond to stimuli. Indeed, hepatocytes produced albumin and urea,38 LSEC displayed characteristic fenestrae and sinusoidal Ac-LDL endocytosis,[39][40][41] HMΦ responded to LPS stimulation, especially those isolated from Ch animals, which is in accordance with recent in vivo data on acute on chronic liver failure,34 and HSC expressed their characteristic activation marker α-SMA. In addition, cells isolated from cirrhotic livers exhibited a phenotype that matched their pathologic situation (hepatocytes: reduced albumin synthesis, 42 LSEC: lack of fenestrae, 43 HMΦ: inflammatory hyperesponse,44 HSC: increased α-SMA expression45 ) …”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…They found out that grafts from old donors had a very limited expression of SMP‐30, and they could not re‐express it even after years of transplantation in pediatric recipients . Moreover, healthy aging may be associated with hepatic and sinusoidal dysfunction causing enhanced sinusoidal vulnerability to acute or chronic injuries as well as with elevated hepatic vascular resistance that leads to decreased graft compliance and causes exacerbation of portal hypertension after liver transplantation using grafts from older donors . Similarly, grafts from ABO‐incompatible donors are associated with a higher risk of acute rejection mixing cellular as well as antibody‐mediated rejection .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(32) Moreover, healthy aging may be associated with hepatic and sinusoidal dysfunction causing enhanced sinusoidal vulnerability to acute or chronic injuries as well as with elevated hepatic vascular resistance that leads to decreased graft compliance and causes exacerbation of portal hypertension after liver transplantation using grafts from older donors. (33) Similarly, grafts from ABO-incompatible donors are associated with a higher risk of acute rejection mixing cellular as well as antibody-mediated rejection. (34) According to the Banff criteria, histological features of acute rejection include lymphocytic infiltration in the portal space and the venous endothelium, and severe inflammation can elevate vascular resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the UNESA population division, approximately 900 million people are 60 years or older worldwide, and this will increase to 21.5% of the global population by 2050 [3] (see Figure 1). As aging progresses, it increases one's susceptibility to diseases associated with this process, such as vascular aging disorders [4][5][6], diabetes [7], muscle dysfunction [8,9], macular degeneration [10], Alzheimer's disease (AD) [11,12], skin diseases [13], and a series of other diseases [14][15][16][17][18] (see Figure 2). Aging-related diseases pose a serious threat to human health and reduce the quality of life among elderly people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%