Objectives: It is well known that body weight loss through a direct (supervised) lifestyle intervention (LSI) improves obesityrelated metabolic disorders. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an indirect LSI on weight loss and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in spouses of LSI participants. Methods: A total of 104 men (abdominal circumference X85 cm; age, 52.1 ± 9.3 years) were assigned to one of three groups: no intervention (NI, n ¼ 34), direct intervention (DI, n ¼ 34) or indirect intervention (II, n ¼ 36), the last of which consisted of subjects who did not participate in the direct LSI but whose wives did. Body weight and MetS components were measured before and after a 14-week intervention. Daily energy intake and activity-related energy expenditure were assessed before and during the intervention. The LSI program was mainly consisted of dietary modifications with a physical activity program. Results: No differences were observed across the three groups in any of the measures at baseline. Significant differences were observed among the groups in weight loss (NI, À0.7 ± 1.4; DI, À6.2 ± 3.3 and II, À4.4 ± 3.7 kg) during the intervention. Along with the body weight reductions, significant improvements were observed in most of MetS components within the DI and II groups. When analyzing the spouse pairs in group II, significant correlations were observed in weight loss (r ¼ 0.57) and decreased total energy intake (r ¼ 0.54) between wives and husbands. Conclusions: Indirect LSI in abdominally obese men whose wives were undergoing LSI led to loss of weight and a decreased incidence of MetS, suggesting that indirect LSI may be an effective program for eliciting beneficial change in health status. one spouse has a significant impact on weight loss in the untreated spouse. They clearly showed 'a ripple effect' on weight loss through spouses. However, the studies did not include examinations of MetS components, which can be greatly affected by changes in body adiposity. To the best of our knowledge, the study by Sexton et al. 17 is the only one to show that a health behavior intervention for one spouse has a ripple effect on cardiovascular risk factors in the other, untreated spouse. Although the study focused on three cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, cigarette smoking and serum cholesterol) it did not examine subjects' weight loss and MetS components. Thus, none of the earlier studies focused on the effects of an indirect LSI on weight loss and improved MetS components in the untreated spouse. Therefore, in this study, we examined the effects on weight loss and MetS components in abdominally obese Japanese men of an indirect LSI through their wives. The primary hypothesis of our study was that the indirect LSI through wives would affect weight loss and improve the MetS components of the husbands who did not receive the direct LSI. We also had a secondary hypothesis that the weight loss and lifestyle changes of wives would correlate with those of their husbands.