2022
DOI: 10.1007/s42106-022-00210-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of activated water irrigation on the growth, water consumption and water use efficiency of winter wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well established that irrigation of 60-75 mm each at jointing and anthesis stage of wheat was the optimal limited irrigation practice for satisfactory yield (Song et al, 2016;Xu et al, 2018). Subsequent research has reported that 60 mm irrigation at the heading stage significantly increased the plant height and dry matter weight, with an observed increase in yield and higher WUE than that under the rainfed condition (Yang et al, 2021). Xu et al (2018) reported that irrigation at the jointing stage resulted in the highest grain yield (8553.9 kg ha −1 ) and WUE (19.8 kg ha −1 mm −1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that irrigation of 60-75 mm each at jointing and anthesis stage of wheat was the optimal limited irrigation practice for satisfactory yield (Song et al, 2016;Xu et al, 2018). Subsequent research has reported that 60 mm irrigation at the heading stage significantly increased the plant height and dry matter weight, with an observed increase in yield and higher WUE than that under the rainfed condition (Yang et al, 2021). Xu et al (2018) reported that irrigation at the jointing stage resulted in the highest grain yield (8553.9 kg ha −1 ) and WUE (19.8 kg ha −1 mm −1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research showed that de-electronized water with high salinity, the negative ions in the water body were effectively eliminated, and the proportion of positive ions was greatly increased, thus affecting the characteristics of soil water and salt transport ( Wang et al., 2016 , 2018 ). Compare to conventional irrigation, de-electronized water irrigation increased the yield per plant and water use efficiency (WUE) of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. ) by 17.8% and 15.1% ( Wang et al., 2020 ). De-electronized water was added during aerobic composting was shorten the period of compost, augment the relative abundance of advantage genus, and then enhance the stability of compost products ( Duan et al., 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the application of ionized technology in irrigation with brackish water has yielded positive outcomes in promoting growth and increasing crop production [14,21]. Ionized water irrigation can improve the growing environment of crops, increase the growth rate and yield of winter wheat, and have a certain buffer effect on soil salt stress [22]. Additionally, ionized irrigation combined with N, P, K can reduce salt stress and improve soil water holding capacity [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%