2003
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.42.1150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Abrasive Morphology and Surfactant Concentration on Polishing Rate of Ceria Slurry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation of defects in surfaces polished with ceria alone (Figs. 5 and 6) are consistent with results reported in past studies [38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Cmp Performance Of Composite Particlessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observation of defects in surfaces polished with ceria alone (Figs. 5 and 6) are consistent with results reported in past studies [38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Cmp Performance Of Composite Particlessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To overcome this limitation, incorporation of ceria nanoparticles within the microgels was pursued. While nanoparticles of ceria are well known for their selectivity and removal of oxide from a wafer surface, they can also produce major and minor scratches [38][39][40][41][42]. Therefore, microcomposites of ceria nanoparticles and microgels were investigated to as a route towards significant improvements in the surface finish while achieving practical rates for oxide removal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 In most cases, a selected layer can be removed through the optimal design of slurries, which can include various kinds of abrasives and chemical components. [3][4][5] The various chemicals and abrasives in slurries can affect the interfacial surfaces that occur during the CMP process at different process temperatures. This effect can change the properties of the polishing pad and produce undesirable variation of the removal rate (RR) as well as within-wafer nonuniformity (WIWNU) throughout the pad lifetime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surfactant layer then acts as a passivation layer, which prevents the abrasive from coming into contact with the film surface. If taking kinematical energy into account, a larger particle can travel through the fluid more freely than a smaller particle [38]. The removal rate is thus strongly influenced by contact probability of the abrasives on the film surface [39].…”
Section: Effect Of Abrasive Particle Size On Removal Rate and Defectimentioning
confidence: 99%