2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on ruminal fermentation and fibre degradation of maize silages in cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

23
83
1
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
23
83
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The above results show that the pH value of rumen fluid in experimental cows is at the lower limit of the reference range (6.16) but is significantly higher (P < 0.01) than in the control cows (5.98). In this experiment, we corroborated the opinion of other authors (Guedes et al 2008) about the influence of yeasts on the stabilization of pH value in the rumen fluid. On the other hand, this stabilization effect of yeast culture on the pH value was not proven by Nikkah et al (2004).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The above results show that the pH value of rumen fluid in experimental cows is at the lower limit of the reference range (6.16) but is significantly higher (P < 0.01) than in the control cows (5.98). In this experiment, we corroborated the opinion of other authors (Guedes et al 2008) about the influence of yeasts on the stabilization of pH value in the rumen fluid. On the other hand, this stabilization effect of yeast culture on the pH value was not proven by Nikkah et al (2004).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…at the peack of production [6] were much lower than those recorded by Marden et al [3]. Nonetheless, they were consistent with those measured in cows receiving a diet composed by corn silage, hay and concentrates by Guedes et al [44] who did not report ruminal pH values below 6.0 over an 8 h-post-feeding period. As a result, LY mode of action proposed by Marden et al [3] was not verified in the present study, certainly because of less acidogenic ruminal conditions induced by both experimental diets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, the host enzymes are unable to hydrolyze these kinds of molecules. Improving the bioavailability of nutrients in a feedstuff by increasing the cell wall hydrolysis through the microbial supplement is a promising solution and, DFM preparations are reported to promote digestion and intestinal hygiene (Gourinier-Chateau et al, 1994), enhance animal performance and reduce usage of antibiotics (Jouany & Morgavi, 2007;Guedes et al, 2008;Wallace et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach that has recently been widely investigated is the application of direct-fed microbial (DFM) preparations, in order to promote digestion and intestinal hygiene (Gourinier-Chateau et al, 1994), enhance animal performance and reduce usage of antibiotics (Jouany & Morgavi, 2007;Guedes et al, 2008;Wallace et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%