2004
DOI: 10.1080/1470329042000208675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a problem‐based learning program on engineering students’ academic achievements in a Mexican university1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
39
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies the area and the scopes measured in this study that might also justify this study finding. The study however reaffirmed previous study findings from multiple educational levels and disciplines [18][19][20]. In the context of study in electrical engineering in polytechnics, students in PBL group did not enhance their critical thinking compared to their counterparts in conventional approach.…”
Section: Discussion and Implicationsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies the area and the scopes measured in this study that might also justify this study finding. The study however reaffirmed previous study findings from multiple educational levels and disciplines [18][19][20]. In the context of study in electrical engineering in polytechnics, students in PBL group did not enhance their critical thinking compared to their counterparts in conventional approach.…”
Section: Discussion and Implicationsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This was illustrated in Polanco et al [18] study; PBL did not change the first-and second-year undergraduate students' critical thinking ability in Mexican universities. Similarly, Choi [19] studied the effect of PBL on a Nursing Process Course in a quasi-experimental study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Literatürde matematik eğitimi alanında probleme dayalı öğrenmeye yönelik yapılan çalışmalar incelendiğinde genellikle akademik başarı (Ali, Akhter, Shahzad, Sultana & Ramzan,2011;Akın, 2009;Ayvacı, 2011;Elshafei, 1999;Eski, 2011;Polanco, Calderon & Delgado, 2004;Özdil, 2011;Özgen, 2007;Uslu, 2006;Usta, 2013), tutum (Biber, 2012;Özdil, 2011;Özgen, 2007;Uslu, 2006) öz yeterlilik inancı (Günhan & Başer, 2008;Usta, 201)) gibi değişkenlerin irdelendiği görülmektedir. Ayrıca bu araştırmaların bir kısmının ilköğretim (Akın, 2009;Ayvacı, 2011;Eski, 2011;Günhan, 2006;Özdil, 2011;Usta, 2013) bir kısmının ortaöğretim (Elshafei, 1999;Özgen, 2007;Özgen & Pesen, 2007;Uslu, 2006) ve bir kısmının ise lisans (Biber, 2012;Liu, 2003;Polanco, Calderon & Delgado, 2004) düzeyi üzerine yoğunlaştığı görülmektedir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Studies show that PBL is effective for improving content learning when compared to traditional teaching approaches (Druck-man & Ebner, 2008;Polanco, Calderón, & Delgado, 2004;Taradi, Taradi, Radic, & Pokrajac, 2005). For example, Bottge, Grant, Stephens, and Rueda (2010) reported that students taught using a problem-based learning methodology (specifically Enhanced Anchored Instruction for middle school math) outperformed students taught using traditional math methods.…”
Section: Pbl and Its Affordancesmentioning
confidence: 99%