2010
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2010.512982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a lower-body exoskeleton device on metabolic cost and gait biomechanics during load carriage

Abstract: This study investigated the effects on metabolic cost and gait biomechanics of using a prototype lower-body exoskeleton (EXO) to carry loads. Nine US Army participants walked at 1.34 m/s on a 0% grade for 8 min carrying military loads of 20 kg, 40 kg and 55 kg with and without the EXO. Mean oxygen consumption (VO(2)) scaled to body mass and scaled to total mass were significantly higher, by 60% and 41% respectively, when the EXO was worn, compared with the control condition. Mean VO(2) and mean VO(2) scaled to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some full-body exoskeletons have resulted in large metabolic penalties (e.g. [7]) while lightweight ankle-foot exoskeletons have resulted in penalties of less than 3% for active autonomous 1 exoskeletons [4] and even close to zero for passive autonomous1 exoskeletons [5]. Reducing the penalty of wearing an exoskeleton in zero-work mode is mainly a design challenge, while increasing the difference between the zero-work condition and powered exoskeleton conditions is mainly a biomechanics challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some full-body exoskeletons have resulted in large metabolic penalties (e.g. [7]) while lightweight ankle-foot exoskeletons have resulted in penalties of less than 3% for active autonomous 1 exoskeletons [4] and even close to zero for passive autonomous1 exoskeletons [5]. Reducing the penalty of wearing an exoskeleton in zero-work mode is mainly a design challenge, while increasing the difference between the zero-work condition and powered exoskeleton conditions is mainly a biomechanics challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of research and industry groups are developing powered lower limb exoskeletons to help people in industry (Hodson, 2014; Lamothe, 2014), military (Zoss et al, 2006; Gregorczyk et al, 2010; Raytheon XOS 2 Exoskeleton, Second-Generation Robotics Suit: Army-Technology, 2010; France’s Slender Hercule Exoskeleton Is No Lightweight, 2012; Asbeck et al, 2015), and healthcare settings (Gancet et al, 2012; Zeilig et al, 2012; Kolakowsky-Hayner et al, 2013; Sczesny-Kaiser et al, 2013; Farris et al, 2014). Progress in hardware development has been rapid and widespread (Huo et al, 2014), but control over these advanced devices still needs significant improvement for exoskeletons to be adopted widely in everyday use (Yan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MIT quasi-passive exoskeleton found an increase metabolism of 32% during assisted walking as compared to control [24]. In [25], a 60% increase of energy consumption was found when a prototype exoskeleton (EXO) was worn as compared with the control condition. However, it is premature to conclude that the walking with LEAD using the proposed method is beneficial over free walking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%