“…PACAP(2-27) was already 50-fold less potent than PACAP(1-27) for binding but retained 90% of its intrinsic effect on adenylate cyclase. In line with other members of this family of peptides (including VIP, secretin and glucagon) [17,18,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], it appears that, upon receptor recognition, the first two residues of PACAP(1-27) played an important role in adenylate cyclase activation, but the N-terminal His1 was not absolutely required. After further deletion, the of PACAP(3 -27), PACAP(5 -27), PACAP(6 -27), PACAP(7 -27) and PACAP(9 -27) were, respectively, 1 500-, 500-, 200-, 1500-and 3800-fold higher than that of PACAP(1-27), and these five PACAP fragments, having lost the ability to stimulate adenylate cyclase, behaved as antagonists (Table 2), i.e.…”