2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2009.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Vasectomy Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no statistical differences in terms of complications, operative time and failure rate in NSV performed with fascial interposition or ligation and excision only [9,10], although in one study, the failure rate in ligation and excision group was found to be high [11]. Excising a large segment (4 cm) of the vas deferens reduces the rate of failure but increases the chance of complications [12]. In the present study, about 2-3 cm of the segment of the vas was excised, and nonabsorbable 2-0 silk suture was used for ligation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no statistical differences in terms of complications, operative time and failure rate in NSV performed with fascial interposition or ligation and excision only [9,10], although in one study, the failure rate in ligation and excision group was found to be high [11]. Excising a large segment (4 cm) of the vas deferens reduces the rate of failure but increases the chance of complications [12]. In the present study, about 2-3 cm of the segment of the vas was excised, and nonabsorbable 2-0 silk suture was used for ligation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches to access vas deferens for vasectomy include pinhole or keyhole, lateral incisions and electro-cautery techniques but they are still investigational in nature. However, the technique used to expose the vas does not relate to effectiveness of the procedure, rather it is the ligation method used that affects its success (Sokal and Labrecque, 2009). The effectiveness of vasectomy is mainly gauged by post-vasectomy semen analysis and at times, by the rates of pregnancy (Sokal and Labrecque, 2009).…”
Section: Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the technique used to expose the vas does not relate to effectiveness of the procedure, rather it is the ligation method used that affects its success (Sokal and Labrecque, 2009). The effectiveness of vasectomy is mainly gauged by post-vasectomy semen analysis and at times, by the rates of pregnancy (Sokal and Labrecque, 2009). No-scalpel vasectomy provides additional advantage in terms of pain control and recovery.…”
Section: Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shown that: 1) the no-scalpel approach to expose the vas (known as the no-scalpel vasectomy, or NSV) reduces the risk of surgical complications over incisional techniques; 2) ligation of the vas and excision of a small segment between the ligatures (LE) is associated with an unacceptable risk of failure and should not be performed; 3) adding fascial interposition (FI) to LE reduces the risk of failure; and 4) cautery of the mucosa of the lumen of the vas combined with FI appears to achieve the most effective occlusion of the vas (1)(2)(3). Although NSV has been widely adopted (4,5), LE is still by far the most common vas occlusion technique performed in many parts of the world (5).…”
Section: Recent Developments In Vasectomy Havementioning
confidence: 99%