2003
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/77.5.1171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of the US Department of Agriculture 5-step multiple-pass method in assessing food intake in obese and nonobese women

Abstract: The USDA 5-step multiple-pass method effectively assessed mean energy intake within 10% of mean actual intake on the previous day. Obese women more accurately recalled food intake than did overweight and normal-weight women despite undereating on the day of the study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
513
1
16

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 688 publications
(532 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
513
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The bias in energy intake with 24 h recalls observed in Subar et al appears to be consistent with the general consensus that energy intake is typically underreported when using criteria such as doubly labeled water (Hill and Davies, 2001;Trabulsi and Schoeller, 2001). However, two investigations that compared the AMPM to a single-day, laboratory-controlled feeding regimen also failed to detect a bias in energy intake in men (Conway et al, 2004), despite biases in normal and overweight women (Conway et al, 2003). The lack of a bias from the current study vs. the clear underreporting from studies such as Subar et al (2003) may be related to the large variation in day-to-day food intake (Rumpler et al, 2006) and the inability to represent adequately this variation with a few 24-h recalls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bias in energy intake with 24 h recalls observed in Subar et al appears to be consistent with the general consensus that energy intake is typically underreported when using criteria such as doubly labeled water (Hill and Davies, 2001;Trabulsi and Schoeller, 2001). However, two investigations that compared the AMPM to a single-day, laboratory-controlled feeding regimen also failed to detect a bias in energy intake in men (Conway et al, 2004), despite biases in normal and overweight women (Conway et al, 2003). The lack of a bias from the current study vs. the clear underreporting from studies such as Subar et al (2003) may be related to the large variation in day-to-day food intake (Rumpler et al, 2006) and the inability to represent adequately this variation with a few 24-h recalls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a second 24-h recall was collected in 26% of adults, only the first recall was used for these analyses. The 24-h dietary recalls used a 5-step multiple pass approach [35,36] and were collected from May to September. Food models helped to estimate portion size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dietary data A single 24 h recall was collected from participants over 2 years of age using the multiple-pass method (28,29) developed by the US Department of Agriculture and a food instruction booklet developed to standardize dietary data collection and reflect cultural and traditional eating behaviours (30) . In addition, food photographs and household measures (cups, spoons, etc.)…”
Section: Anthropometric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%