Effectiveness of Subgingival Irrigation as an Adjunct to Scaling and Root Planing in the Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis: A Systematic Review

Nagarakanti, Sreenivas; Gunupati, Sumanth; Chava, Vijay Kumar; Reddy, Bhumanapalli Venkata Ramesh

doi:10.7860/jcdr/2015/13862.6210

Cited by 17 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Scaling and root planing (SRP) is the most common periodontal treatment which has proven clinical effectiveness in terms of decreasing the probing pocket depth, reducing inflammation and improving the clinical attachment level (CAL) (Haffajee et al., ). SRP has some limitations, such as difficulties in accessing deeper pockets, root concavities and furcation areas (Nagarakanti, Gunupati, Chava, & Reddy, ; Rabbani, Ash, & Caffesse, ) and difficulty to remove microbial pathogens that have penetrated into dentinal tubules and which are residing in lacunae and concavities (Mombelli, Cionca, & Almaghlouth, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of surgical periodontal treatment associated to antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on chronic periodontitis: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Martins

Novaes

Taba

et al. 2017

J Clinic Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of surgical periodontal treatment associated to antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on chronic periodontitis: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Martins

Novaes

Taba

et al. 2017

J Clinic Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The most commonly occurred periodontal disease is gingival inflammation such as gingivitis and periodontitis. Untreated gingival inflammation could lead to further periodontal inflammation or periodontitis [1]. Periodontitis is defined as an inflammatory disease in periodontal tissues that supports some specified-microorganisms or certain groups of specific bacteria, which are needed to progressively destroy periodontal ligament and alveolar bone with pocket locking, recession, or accordingly [2].…”

Section: Ntroductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness evaluation of chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide combination toward anaerobic gingival sulcus bacteria

Adiningrat¹,

Lacti²,

Pangastuti³

et al. 2019

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2019 – Health Science and Nursing (IcoSIHSN 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Anaerobic bacteria in the gingival sulcus is the critical etiological factor for initiation and development of periodontal disease such as gingivitis and periodontitis. In addition to scaling and other regular treatments, supporting treatment such as giving irrigating solution using chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide to the gingival sulcus was commonly performed by many dental practitioners. Several pharmaceutical companies also provide some modified irrigating solutions for better efficacy and convenience. However, there is still insufficient evidence for each modification. The purpose of this study is to confirm the effectiveness of utilizing combined irrigation solution of chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide toward bacterial growth inhibitory capacity. This research was conducted as a laboratory experiment in vitro. The isolated bacteria from human gingival sulcus was taken as the bacterial sample. The experiment was performed by using disc diffusion method on blood agar plate media which was then followed by measuring the bacterial inhibitory zone using sliding caliper. Irrigating solutions for the treatment consisted of 0.2% chlorhexidine and 0.2% chlorhexidine combined with 3% hydrogen peroxide. Homogeneity test by Levene showed that the data were normally distributed. Therefore, Anova variant analysis test was performed. The statistical analysis results showed that the obtained F value was higher than F table with significant p value of < 0.05. These results suggested that there was a significant bacterial growth inhibitory capacity among the groups. The post-hoc analysis indicated that using 0.2% chlorhexidine solution gave higher mean-difference. A Standalone of 0.2% chlorhexidine solution was more effective for anaerobic gingival sulcus bacteria growth inhibition.

show abstract

“…7 Numerous studies from the past decade address the impact of subgingival irrigation on clinical and microbiologic parameters. 8 Investigations using subgingival irrigation as a monotherapy and in combination with root planing provided a perspective on the benefits and limitations of this treatment method. 9 The biological rationale for subgingival irrigation is a non-specific action of flushing the pocket contents and thereby effectively altering the quality and quantity of unattached subgingival plaque.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adult periodontitis treated with a new device for subgingival lavage-a randomized controlled clinical trial using a split-mouth design

Dijk¹

2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effectiveness of Subgingival Irrigation as an Adjunct to Scaling and Root Planing in the Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis: A Systematic Review

Cited by 17 publications

References 42 publications

Effect of surgical periodontal treatment associated to antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on chronic periodontitis: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Effect of surgical periodontal treatment associated to antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on chronic periodontitis: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Effectiveness evaluation of chlorhexidine and hydrogen peroxide combination toward anaerobic gingival sulcus bacteria

Adult periodontitis treated with a new device for subgingival lavage-a randomized controlled clinical trial using a split-mouth design

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About