“…While the coarse spectral resolution of imaging instruments such as Landsat-TM, ETMþ, ASTER, SPOT-HRV, IRS-LISS limits the ability to distinguish and map finer spectral differences of materials, very narrow spectral resolution coupled with large number of spectral bands significantly reduces the efficiency and accuracy of spectral analysis methods for material mapping. Consequently, numerous studies have reported the selection of optimal spectral bands as a compromise solution for an efficient processing of hyperspectral data for material mapping (Karlholm and Renhorn, 2002;Skurichina et al, 2006;Melendez-Pastor et al, 2008). Furthermore, the majority of the current generation hyperspectral imaging systems (eg, AVIRIS, HyMAP, DICE, CASI) acquires spectral data at a spectral resolution of 10-20 nm with variable sampling intervals, thus requiring the resampling of the finer resolution spectral libraries to match to that of the hyperspectral image under consideration.…”