1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)91758-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Neonatal Screening for Congenital Dislocation of the Hip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1.0 per 1000 live births. This expected rate in an unscreened population has been validated by other workers (Mackenzie, 1972;Place et al, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…1.0 per 1000 live births. This expected rate in an unscreened population has been validated by other workers (Mackenzie, 1972;Place et al, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The findings are also inconsistent: some studies observed a decrease in operative rates, [15][16][17][18] whereas others saw no change 19,20 or an increase. [21][22][23] Ascertainment of cases was often flawed, and the studies span several decades, which make it difficult to assess whether the varied results represent artifacts of data quality, secular trends, or differences in local practice styles.…”
Section: Keymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Interpretation and comparison of rates of late diagnosed DDH is often difficult, especially in relation to the strict definition and age at diagnosis. Reported rates can range from 0.07 to 2.0 per 1000 births.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported rates can range from 0.07 to 2.0 per 1000 births. 10 The cut off age for inclusion for late diagnosis is not consistent in the literature and can vary from 6 weeks to 20 months. 6 9 Palmen 14 reported a prevalence of late diagnosed DDH in the presence of a well established neonatal screening procedure of 0.53 per 1000 in the period 1973-1976.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%