Background:Existing radiographic classification schemes (eg, Tönnis criteria) for DDH quantify the severity of disease based on the position of the ossific nucleus relative to Hilgenreiner’s and Perkin’s lines. By definition, this method requires the presence of an ossification centre, which can be delayed in appearance and eccentric in location within the femoral head. A new radiographic classification system has been developed by the International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI), which uses the mid-point of the proximal femoral metaphysis as a reference landmark, and can therefore be applied to children of all ages. The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability of this new method with that of Tönnis, as the first step in establishing its validity and clinical utility.Methods:Twenty standardized anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of children with untreated DDH were selected purposefully to capture the spectrum of age (range, 3 to 32 mo) at presentation and disease severity. Each of the hips was classified separately by the IHDI and Tönnis methods by 6 experienced pediatric orthopaedists from the United States, Canada, Mexico, United Kingdom, and by 2 orthopaedic senior residents. The inter-rater reliability was tested using the Intra Class Correlation coefficient (ICC) to measure concordance between raters.Results:All 40 hips were classifiable by the IHDI method by all raters. Ten of the 40 hips could not be classified by the Tönnis method because of the absence of the ossific nucleus on one or both sides. The ICC (95% confidence interval) for the IHDI method for all raters was 0.90 (0.83-0.95) and 0.95 (0.91-0.98) for the right and left hips, respectively. The corresponding ICCs for the Tönnis method were 0.63 (0.46-0.80) and 0.60 (0.43-0.78), respectively. There was no significant difference between the ICCs of the 6 experts and 2 trainees.Conclusions:The IHDI method of classification has excellent inter-rater reliability, both among experts and novices, and is more widely applicable than the Tönnis method as it can be applied even when the ossification centre is absent.Level of Evidence:Level II (diagnostic).

No abstract

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently used for postoperative pain control. However, concerns regarding the potential deleterious effects of NSAIDs on bone healing have compelled many physicians to avoid NSAIDs in patients with healing fractures, osteotomies, and fusions. We systematically reviewed and analyzed the best clinical evidence regarding the effects of NSAID exposure on bone healing. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases were searched for prospective and retrospective clinical studies of fracture, osteotomy, and fusion studies of patients with NSAID exposure and nonunion as an outcome. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data on study design, patient characteristics, and risk estimates were extracted. Pooled effect estimates were calculated. Subanalyses were performed by bone type and by NSAID dose, duration, and route of administration. In the initial analysis of 11 cohort and case-control studies, the pooled odds ratio for nonunion with NSAID exposure was 3.0 (95% confidence interval 1.6-5.6). A significant association between lower-quality studies and higher reported odds ratios for nonunion was observed. When only higher-quality studies were considered, seven spine fusion studies were analyzed, and no statistically significant association between NSAID exposure and nonunion was identified (odds ratio = 2.2, 95% confidence interval 0.8-6.3). There was no increased risk of nonunion with NSAID exposure when only the highest-quality studies were assessed. Randomized controlled trials assessing NSAID exposure in fracture, fusion, and osteotomy populations are warranted to confirm or refute the findings of this meta-analysis of observational studies.

Detection and Nonoperative Management of Pediatric Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Infants up to Six Months of Age: Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline is based on a systematic review of the current scientific and clinical research. This guideline has been endorsed by the Society of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, the Society for Pediatric Radiology, American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. The purpose of this clinical practice guideline is to help improve treatment and management based on the current evidence. This guideline contains nine recommendations, including both diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the work group highlighted the need for better research in the early diagnosis and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Level II.