Effectiveness of motor intervention on children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD): A systematic review

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the quality of evidence obtainable from published clinical trials on motor interventions, and assess whether the quality, in terms of methods and results, is sufficient to enable the development of evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice on children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). Here, a systematic review was conducted, with the addition of randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized studies, with no language or time restrictions. Preschool and school-aged children of both sexes, with DCD were considered for inclusion. As the primary outcome, the motor skills of the children were evaluated. Searches were conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, SCOPUS, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PSYCINFO. Results revealed that 1002 studies were encountered. After screening, 21 studies were initially considered eligible. Finally, after analysing the full articles, 9 studies involving 339 children were selected, comprising 6 randomized controlled trials and three quasi-randomized studies. The quality of evidence of most of the included trials was sufficient to recommend motor interventions for clinical practice on children with DCD. Finally, more clinical trials would be needed so as to define the best intervention, since different interventions presented positive effects.

The Effects of Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents with Developmental Coordination Disorder

“…Also, it became clear that in various research, the improvement in the sensory-motor skills of the participants was not due to the implementation of the intervention programs but to other external environmental factors (e.g., in parallel physical therapy sessions) [11]. From the above, it is understood that a large number of interventions have low reliability, risk of bias and, consequently, lack of internal validity [10,12,16,58,59]. Finally, with regard to external validity, various research of the global scientific community was mainly applied to small samples, which may well lead to a lack of generalizability of the results and a lack of external validity [16,57,59].…”

Cognizance and perception of physiotherapy intervention in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder amongst clinical physiotherapy students in tertiary institution, Nigeria

“…Improvements in neurobehavioural functions have been demonstrated, including reduced impulsivity and hyperactivity, improved attention, and enhanced performance on executive functioning tasks [19]. Physiotherapy management using multiple approaches, namely motor perception, sensory integration therapy, kinesiotherapy, neurobehavioural performance, and a motor intervention programme, also showed significant improvements in balance, fine motor skills, body image, and temporal organization in children with ADHD [24].…”

Cognizance and Perception of Physiotherapy Intervention in Attention- Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Amongst Clinical Physiotherapy Students in Tertiary Institution, Nigeria

“…Improvements in neurobehavioral functions have been demonstrated, including reduced impulsivity and hyperactivity, improved attention, and enhanced performance on executive functioning tasks [19]. Physiotherapy management using multiple approaches namely motor perception, sensory integration therapy, kinesiotherapy, neurobehavioral performance, and a motor intervention program also showed signi cant improvements in balance, ne motor skills, body image, and temporal organization in children with ADHD [24].…”