1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0265-931x(97)00090-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of immediate and delayed AFCF application in reducing radiocaesium transfer to ryegrass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Doses of 10 g m -2 provoked a 25-fold decrease in sandy soils, although only a 64% reduction in loamy soils. For aged RCs, reduction decreased to 3.5 times in sandy soils, with the same amendment dose ( , ). Therefore, our field results and others previously reported strengthen the need of a previous detailed characterization step and laboratory back-up for the selection of suitable amendments for a given soil type.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doses of 10 g m -2 provoked a 25-fold decrease in sandy soils, although only a 64% reduction in loamy soils. For aged RCs, reduction decreased to 3.5 times in sandy soils, with the same amendment dose ( , ). Therefore, our field results and others previously reported strengthen the need of a previous detailed characterization step and laboratory back-up for the selection of suitable amendments for a given soil type.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported to have no effect on plant growth in soil (Vandenhove et al. , 1996; 1998; 2000). However, the potentially formed free cyanide (Kang et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of long-term physical, chemical and management-based measures can be taken to reduce the soil-plant-animal transfer of radionuclides and in turn limit their entry into the human food chain (IAEA, 1994). Included are techniques such as deep ploughing (Vovk et al, 1993), soil application of fertilisers (Nisbet et al, 1994), use of binding agents in soils (Vandenhove et al, 1998) or livestock (Voigt, 1993), changes in livestock management (Howard, 1993) or in land use (IAEA, 1994). In the event of a future nuclear accident, it is critical that not only the 'optimal' countermeasure should be selected for each agricultural situation, but also that the benefits gained in lowering the transfer of radionuclides into the human food chain are not outweighed by negative environmental, social or economic impacts from that countermeasure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%