2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of flip teaching on engineering students' performance in the physics lab

Abstract: Graphical abstractHighlights:• Lab results for Flip and Traditional Methodologies are analysed and compared.• Flip Teaching in the lab sessions improves students' academic performance.• Since students spend more time thinking, they write better lab reports.• Definition of the "analogous students" enables a more detailed statistical study. José A. Gómez-Tejedor et al., Computers AbstractThe progressive introduction of the flip teaching (FT) instructional model into higher education has accelerated in recent yea… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
17
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample in this data paper was formed by 1233 students enrolled from 2013 to 2017 who completed the subjects of Physics (Phys) and Electricity (Elec) following two different methodologies: Traditional Methodology (TM) and Flip Teaching Methodology (FT) [1]. The previous grade that gave access to the university was very similar during all these years, between 6 and 7 (out of 10).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sample in this data paper was formed by 1233 students enrolled from 2013 to 2017 who completed the subjects of Physics (Phys) and Electricity (Elec) following two different methodologies: Traditional Methodology (TM) and Flip Teaching Methodology (FT) [1]. The previous grade that gave access to the university was very similar during all these years, between 6 and 7 (out of 10).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous grade that gave access to the university was very similar during all these years, between 6 and 7 (out of 10). The sample characteristics, the method used each year and course (TM or FT), the number of enrolled students, and the number of students that completed the course are summarized in Table 1 of reference [1], and more detailed information about the methodology is given in Ref. [1].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En este trabajo se analizan los resultados de una encuesta de opinión sobre la aplicación de la docencia inversa en las asignaturas de Física de los grados de Ingeniería Aeroespacial, Ingeniería Informática y la asignatura de Biofísica en el Grado de Ingeniería Biomédica. La implementación de la metodología de DIN en todos los casos es similar y ha sido descrita previamente (Bernal-Perez et al, 2019;Gómez-Tejedor et al, 2020;Vidaurre et al, 2018;Vidaurre et al, 2017). Los estudiantes disponen de una programación semanal de todo el curso.…”
Section: Desarrollo De La Innovaciónunclassified
“…Este método cambia las condiciones de dónde y cuándo los estudiantes realizan sus tareas de aprendizaje. Mientras que en la metodología tradicional el profesorado explica conceptos nuevos en clase y el alumnado reflexiona más tarde, en casa, sobre el contenido, en el modelo DIN el alumnado prepara el contenido de la clase en casa, por adelantado (a través del material disponible), mientras que en clase se trabaja y se discute trabajando en equipo (Garrison & Vaughan, 2013;Hung & Chou, 2015;Gómez-Tejedor et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation