2003
DOI: 10.1021/jp021590l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Diffuse Basis Functions for Calculating Relative Energies by Density Functional Theory

Abstract: The addition of diffuse functions to a double-ζ basis set is shown to be more important than increasing to a triple-ζ basis when calculating reaction energies, reaction barrier heights, and conformational energies with density functional theory, in particular with the modified Perdew−Wang density functional. It is shown that diffuse basis functions are vital to describe the relative energies between reactants, products, and transition states in isogyric reactions, and they provide enormous improvement in accur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
664
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 718 publications
(677 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(73 reference statements)
11
664
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While PARI-K yields impressive accuracy in its own right, the accuracy of occ-RI-K is clearly superior. The errors per electron in the absolute energies of all molecules in the test set are quite 73,74 0.00 0.00 Butanediol65 75 0.00 0.00 BzDC215 76 0.00 0.00 CT20 77 0.00 0.00 DIE60 78 0.00 0.00 DS14 79 0.00 0.01 EA13 80 0.01 0.01 EIE22 81 0.00 0.00 FmH2O10 82,83 0.01 0.16 ACONF 84,85 0.00 0.01 BHPERI 85,86 0.00 0.00 CYCONF 85,87 0.00 0.00 G21EA 85,88 0.00 0.00 G21IP 85,88 0.00 0.00 NBPRC 85 0.00 0.02 WATER27 85,89 0.00 0.03 NHTBH38 85,90 0.01 0.02 HTBH38 85,91 0.00 0.01 BH76RC 85 0.00 0.00 DBH24 86 0.00 0.01 H2O6Bind8 83,92 0.00 0.05 HB15 93 0.00 0.01 HSG 94,95 0.00 0.00 HW30 96 0.00 0.01 HW6Cl 82,83 0.00 0.04 HW6F 82,83 0.00 0.04 IP13 80 0.00 0.00 NBC10 95 0.01 0.01 NC15 97 0.00 0.00 Pentane14 98 0.00 0.01 RG10 99 0.00 0.00 S22 …”
Section: A Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While PARI-K yields impressive accuracy in its own right, the accuracy of occ-RI-K is clearly superior. The errors per electron in the absolute energies of all molecules in the test set are quite 73,74 0.00 0.00 Butanediol65 75 0.00 0.00 BzDC215 76 0.00 0.00 CT20 77 0.00 0.00 DIE60 78 0.00 0.00 DS14 79 0.00 0.01 EA13 80 0.01 0.01 EIE22 81 0.00 0.00 FmH2O10 82,83 0.01 0.16 ACONF 84,85 0.00 0.01 BHPERI 85,86 0.00 0.00 CYCONF 85,87 0.00 0.00 G21EA 85,88 0.00 0.00 G21IP 85,88 0.00 0.00 NBPRC 85 0.00 0.02 WATER27 85,89 0.00 0.03 NHTBH38 85,90 0.01 0.02 HTBH38 85,91 0.00 0.01 BH76RC 85 0.00 0.00 DBH24 86 0.00 0.01 H2O6Bind8 83,92 0.00 0.05 HB15 93 0.00 0.01 HSG 94,95 0.00 0.00 HW30 96 0.00 0.01 HW6Cl 82,83 0.00 0.04 HW6F 82,83 0.00 0.04 IP13 80 0.00 0.00 NBC10 95 0.01 0.01 NC15 97 0.00 0.00 Pentane14 98 0.00 0.01 RG10 99 0.00 0.00 S22 …”
Section: A Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HL calculations were carry out by means of the M06-2X functional 71 with the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set 72 following Truhlar and co-workers suggestions. 71,73 The 6-311+G(2df,2p) basis set 74,75 was also checked for the F system (mechanism I), since this is the one specifically recommended for this element. Test on the use of both basis sets rendered almost quantitatively equivalent results (see Figure S2 of Supporting Information) and consequently the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set was used for all calculations.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IV. For the calculations on those databases, we used the MG3S basis set 47 for main-group elements and the def2-TZVP basis set 48 for calculations that involve transition metals.…”
Section: B Software Basis Sets Relativistic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%