Effectiveness of collaborative map-based decision support tools: Results of an experiment

Arciniegas, Gustavo; Janssen, Ron; Rietveld, Piet

doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.02.021

Cited by 81 publications

(65 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Hence, for this study (and with the request from those responsible for Natura 2000 and ICZM processes), to successfully contribute to real management, it has since conveyed all collected GIS data into a Spatial Data Infrastructure managed by the researchers (http://www.indigeo.fr/). Spatial dimension introduced by maps as visual artefacts stimulate the exchange between researchers and stakeholders to better address complex issues [20]. Yet, the dynamic component of the GIS appears to be of prime importance.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This process has existed for many decades although this is moderately due to the advancements of information technology, such as the GIS and GIS-based tools that illustrate different scenarios [14]. Previous studies have demonstrated the value of GIS in the participatory process of integrated land-use planning, by measures of supporting local and expert spatial knowledge [18][19][20]. In fact, several involved the combined processes of virtual scenario simulations, particularly in coastal areas [21,22].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, these studies relied strongly on geographic information technology to optimize management strategies and public participation in integrated management stakes [23][24][25]. Yet, few studies have explored the evaluation of interactive spatial support tools [20,26]. Hence, this contribution aims to: (i) provide a GIS-based method to better understand the spatio-temporal distribution of supervised maritime activities; (ii) identify potential conflicts between these activities; (iii) develop an approach to share data, information and knowledge among stakeholders; and (iv) test the contribution of this approach for better exchanges between stakeholders toward collective actions and scenarios.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Dynamic GIS as an Efficient Tool for Integrated Coastal Zone Management

Gourmelon

Guyader

Fontenelle

2014

IJGI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This contribution addresses both the role of geographical information in participatory research of coastal zones, and its potential to bridge the gap between research and coastal zone management. Over a one year period, heterogeneous data (spatial, temporal, qualitative and quantitative) were obtained which included the process of interviews, storing in a spatio-temporal database. The GIS (Geographic Information System) produced temporal snapshots of daily human activity patterns allowing it to map, identify and quantify potential space-time conflicts between activities. It was furthermore used to facilitate the exchange of ideas and knowledge at various levels: by mapping, simulation, GIS analysis and data collection. Results indicated that both captured data and the participatory workshop added real value to management and therefore it was deemed well managed by stakeholders. To incorporate a dynamic GIS would enhance pro-active integrated management by opening the path for better discussions whilst permitting management simulated scenarios.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Dynamic GIS as an Efficient Tool for Integrated Coastal Zone Management

Gourmelon

Guyader

Fontenelle

2014

IJGI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The third term, 'Systems', comprises the overwhelming majority in PSS studies, mainly describing the technical details, underlying models and structure of the instruments (e.g., Geneletti 2008;Demetriou et al 2013, most of the chapters in Geertman et al 2013). The middle term, 'Support', has only recently received more rigorous empirical attention (e.g., Arciniegas et al 2013;Goodspeed 2013;Te Brömmelstroet 2013). In a range of applications the performance of PSS to support planning is evaluated, mostly in a quasi-experimental setting (Arciniegas et al 2011Jankowski and Nyerges 2001;Salter et al 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Planning Support Systems and Task-Technology Fit: a Comparative Case Study

Pelzer

Arciniegas²,

Geertman

et al. 2015

Appl. Spatial Analysis

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Studies in the Planning Support Systems (PSS) debate are increasingly paying attention to the support function of PSS. This involves among other things studying the usefulness of PSS to practitioners. This paper adds another dimension to this evolving debate by arguing that planning tasks should receive more attention. Although planning tasks are central in several PSS definitions, they have hardly received explicit attention in empirical studies. In an aim to fill this void we conducted an empirical study based on the perspective of tasktechnology fit. The latter consists of a combination ('fit') of analytical and communicative support capabilities ('technologies'), and three types of planning tasks: exploration, selection and negotiation. Next, we selected four case studies in the Netherlands, in which the same PSS was applied, which consists of a combination of the CommunityViz software and a touch-enabled MapTable. The cases differed in the planning tasks that were central during the workshop, resulting in different kinds of usefulness attributed to the PSS. For instance, in one case with a selection task the communicative support capabilities contributed to the transparency of the process, whereas in another the analytic support capabilities of the PSS improved the task of negotiation because of the iterative feedback it provided. The paper concludes with the observation that the concept of task-technology fit has potential be applied in different contexts and with different types of PSS.

show abstract

“…In practice, the assessment of Usefulness generally includes meetings devoted to monitoring the participants' interaction with the DSS. Most assessments also consider the degree of Perceived Usefulness (PU - Arciniegas et al 2013) and/or the Perceived Ease of Use (PEU). PU is an indicator of the impact a system has on work effectiveness and is defined as the degree to which a person believes that using a particular system may enhance his/her job performance (Davis 1989).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Usefulness and perceived usefulness of Decision Support Systems (DSSs) in participatory forest planning: the final users’ point of view

Pastorella¹,

Borges²,

Meo³

2016

iForest

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

, Isabella De Meo (3)In recent decades, the focus of forestry Decision Support Systems (DSSs) has expanded to consider the social dimension of forestry and to support participatory decision-making. A large number of models and tools have become available to solve forest management planning problems. The Usefulness of a DSS depends on the range of tools that it incorporates, and many researches have been developed to evaluate DSSs using Usefulness as parameter. The assessment of Usefulness concerns the effectiveness of a DSS. Furthermore, most assessments take into account the degree of Perceived Usefulness, which is considered an indicator of the impact a system has on job performance. The present study focuses on the analysis of final users' point of view on the Usefulness and Perceived Usefulness of DSSs in participatory forest planning. The research investigates how forest users' characteristics and context influence their views on the potentialities of DSSs to enhance both the various phases of the participatory planning process (Usefulness) and job performance (Perceived Usefulness). The study is based on quantitative data collected through two questionnaires e-mailed to a sample of 150 DSSs end users. The questionnaires focused on Usefulness and on Perceived Usefulness topics, respectively. Results indicate that special attention must be given to motivating respondents with a clear explanation of the survey objectives when e-mailing questionnaires. Moreover, results show that, in general, respondents consider DSSs useful at each step of the participatory process, despite differences emerge among steps. The research also shows that respondents' Perceived Usefulness of DSSs was higher before actually engaging with DSSs. Furthermore, the results highlight differences in Perceived Usefulness to improve job performance, suggesting that the use of DSSs may actually improve job performance more than expected. Specifically, results indicate that improving the technical descriptions of methodologies incorporated in a DSS may contribute to increasing the Perceived Usefulness. The information provided within this research contributes to the advancement of knowledge regarding the Usefulness of DSSs as perceived by forest stakeholders, which in turn supports the improvement of DSS architectures and the development of participatory processes in forest management planning.

show abstract

Effectiveness of collaborative map-based decision support tools: Results of an experiment

Cited by 81 publications

References 36 publications

A Dynamic GIS as an Efficient Tool for Integrated Coastal Zone Management

A Dynamic GIS as an Efficient Tool for Integrated Coastal Zone Management

Planning Support Systems and Task-Technology Fit: a Comparative Case Study

Usefulness and perceived usefulness of Decision Support Systems (DSSs) in participatory forest planning: the final users’ point of view

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About