2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-018-3580-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of a multi-slot vertical slot fishway versus a standard vertical slot fishway for potamodromous cyprinids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proximity of these two swirls generated an area with higher TKE and RSS, precisely in the vicinity of slot 2. Fish passage results show a significantly higher number of movements that occurred in the MSF, relative to the VSF [93]. However, despite a higher overall magnitude of hydraulic parameters, mean velocity (U), TKE, and horizontal RSS in the VSF, no differences were found in the entrance time, entry efficiency, and in the number of successes between both types of facilities.…”
Section: Vertical Slot Fishways (Vsf)mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The proximity of these two swirls generated an area with higher TKE and RSS, precisely in the vicinity of slot 2. Fish passage results show a significantly higher number of movements that occurred in the MSF, relative to the VSF [93]. However, despite a higher overall magnitude of hydraulic parameters, mean velocity (U), TKE, and horizontal RSS in the VSF, no differences were found in the entrance time, entry efficiency, and in the number of successes between both types of facilities.…”
Section: Vertical Slot Fishways (Vsf)mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In both configurations, the hydraulic head drop between pools, ∆H, was 0.16 m. The MSF presented a twofold number of slots compared with the standard VSF; thus, although in the MSF the ∆H was also 0.16 m, this head drop was divided into two becoming approximately 0.08 m per slot. Comparing both configurations in terms of hydraulic parameters-mean velocity (U), TKE, and RSS-revealed that VSF presented higher overall magnitudes than the MSF design ( Figure 2 in Romão et al [93]). Indeed, flow velocity reached a maximum of 1.9 m·s −1 in the VSF and 1.4 m·s −1 in the MSF, both in the vicinity of the slots (i.e., slots 1 and 2 in the VSF and slots 1-4 in the MSF).…”
Section: Vertical Slot Fishways (Vsf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, numerical modelling was performed to characterize the hydrodynamics of all the configurations tested, using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) commercial software FLOW-3D ® . Iberian barbel was selected as the target species, since it is considered representative of a few species of medium-sized benthic potamodromous cyprinids commonly present in Iberian and Western European rivers [22,38,39]. It was expected that: (i) passage performance of fish, considering attraction as well as successful upstream movements, will be influenced by both factors Q and RD; (ii) attraction efficiency would increase with increasing Q, and with RD that provide higher velocity magnitudes; and (iii) successful passages, and consequently passage efficiency, would decrease with increasing Q and with RD presenting high turbulence and high velocity magnitude.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%