2017
DOI: 10.1177/0885066617720631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness and Safety of Magnesium Replacement in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to the Medical Intensive Care Unit in an Academic Medical Center: A Retrospective, Cohort Study

Abstract: Medically, critically ill patients who received nonprotocolized magnesium replacement achieved the target serum magnesium concentration less frequently than the "rule of thumb" estimation predicted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the incidence of hypomagnesaemia was significantly lower in the study group from the second day to the seventh day of the study. This is in accordance with Hammond et al (2017), [43] Kanji and Jung (2009), [35] Owen et al (2008) [40] and Hijazi and Al-Ansari (2005) [13] findings. On the country, Couture et al (2013) [33] did not find difference between the two groups in relation to magnesium replacement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Consequently, the incidence of hypomagnesaemia was significantly lower in the study group from the second day to the seventh day of the study. This is in accordance with Hammond et al (2017), [43] Kanji and Jung (2009), [35] Owen et al (2008) [40] and Hijazi and Al-Ansari (2005) [13] findings. On the country, Couture et al (2013) [33] did not find difference between the two groups in relation to magnesium replacement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A common rule of thumb for IV magnesium replacement is a serum change range of 0.08 to 0.18 mg/dL per gram administered; therefore, the change expected from 3 to 5 g of IV magnesium would have been 0.2 to 0.9 mg/ dL. 2,3 Unfortunately, various other factors were not reported including renal function, use of enteral or oral nutrition, presence of diarrhea, and insulin or diuretic use that could have affected the primary and secondary outcomes. In addition, the number of patients who received oral magnesium was reported, but the rationale why it was used (over IV replacement or concurrently), dose, and number of days received were not, as this could have contributed to fecal magnesium losses.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inadequate replacement of magnesium may have affected attainment of target serum potassium concentrations in our sample; however, achievement of a safe, target magnesium concentration of at least 2 mEq/L may occur less often than previously thought after magnesium replacement. 12 In a cohort of critically ill patients with hypomagnesemia who had magnesium replacement, less than 60% of the patients achieved a serum magnesium concentration of at least 2 mEq/L.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%