1999
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/8/1/017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness and optimization of fiber Bragg grating sensor as embedded strain sensor

Abstract: The strain field of a host with an embedded optic fiber is analyzed under a uniform three-principal strain load on the host in order to study the measurement effectiveness of fiber Bragg grating sensor (FBGS) as embedded strain sensor. Three indicators are defined to depict the strain measurement effectiveness of a fiber Bragg grating sensor embedded in a host. The numerical results represent the strain distributions in the host, coating and optic fiber as functions of the elastic modulus of coating and the ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By considering the effects of the strain-optic relationship, the axial strain e induced shift of Bragg wavelength is [15) ' or where E, , -2 are the axial strain and the transverse strain of the fiber, respectively, p j j and p, are the components of the strain-optic tensor, a' is the isothermal expansion coefficient, ~' is a thermo-optic constant of the optic fiber [ 15J (for silica, a' = 0.55 X 10'~, ~ = 8.3 X 10-6), and f and ~' are the strain sensitivity and thermal sensitivity, respectively. ' Equation 3 shows that the Bragg wavelength A change's linearly with the temperature variation (3T) and axial strain of the Bragg grating (E, ), which was confirmed by our previous studies [1~¡ 14,15]. Obviously, the strain sensitivity f is a function of material properties and the strained state of the fiber.…”
Section: Theoretical Fbg Sensorssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…By considering the effects of the strain-optic relationship, the axial strain e induced shift of Bragg wavelength is [15) ' or where E, , -2 are the axial strain and the transverse strain of the fiber, respectively, p j j and p, are the components of the strain-optic tensor, a' is the isothermal expansion coefficient, ~' is a thermo-optic constant of the optic fiber [ 15J (for silica, a' = 0.55 X 10'~, ~ = 8.3 X 10-6), and f and ~' are the strain sensitivity and thermal sensitivity, respectively. ' Equation 3 shows that the Bragg wavelength A change's linearly with the temperature variation (3T) and axial strain of the Bragg grating (E, ), which was confirmed by our previous studies [1~¡ 14,15]. Obviously, the strain sensitivity f is a function of material properties and the strained state of the fiber.…”
Section: Theoretical Fbg Sensorssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The induced shift of the Bragg wavelength is given by [ 14] or where E~, E2 are the axial strain and the transverse strain of fiber, respectively, p , j and p, 2 are components of the strain-optic tensor, a' is the isothermal expansion coefficient, ~' is regarded as a thermo-optic constant of the optic fiber, and f and §* are the strain sensitivity and thermal sensitivity, respectively. Equation 5 shows that the Bragg wavelength A changes linearly with variations in the temperature (å 1) and axial strain of the Bragg grating (8, ), as confirmed by our previous studies [1, 13,14]. Obviously, the strain sensitivity f is a function of material properties and the strained state of the fiber.…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
“…Therefore, FBG sensors seem to be ideal for realizing fiber optic smart structures, where sensors are embedded in or attached to structures for a number of technical objectives, such as health monitoring, impact detection, shape control, and vibration damping, by means of the provision of realtime sensing information, such as strain, temperature, and vibration. FBG sensors have been used in bridges, highways, textiles, mines, marine vehicles, medical therapies, and aircraft [ 1, 10,11,13]. Because the physical size of optical fibers is extremely small compared with other strain measuring components, they can be embed-ded in structures to determine strain distribution without significantly inHuencing the mechanical properties of the host materials [ 14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As visible, the β values range from 0.32 cm·nm −1 to 2.78 cm·nm −1 . Such a dispersion might be attributable to two causes: the sensor manufacturing process (in fact, as demonstrated by Tang et al in [ 36 ], the sensitivity of FBG-based sensors strictly depends on the housing material shape and stiffness) and the intra and inter subject variability of the sensor positioning (i.e., change in position of the sensor caused by the movements performed by a single volunteer during the trials execution, and the sensor different positioning between different subjects which is determined by the dissimilar anthropometric characteristics). In our experimental scenario, the wide variations in β values can be ascribable to the second cause, as the same sensor was exploited during the entire experimental protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%