2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
710
6
38

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,009 publications
(841 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
37
710
6
38
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, WUE was 2 (P = 0.89), 12 (P = 0.37), and 27% (P = 0.10) lower for CW 3 , CW 2 and CW 1 , respectively, than for CW 4 . This result supports the premise that water deficit can increase plant WUE (Meyers et al, 1984;Blum, 2009).…”
Section: Wuesupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, WUE was 2 (P = 0.89), 12 (P = 0.37), and 27% (P = 0.10) lower for CW 3 , CW 2 and CW 1 , respectively, than for CW 4 . This result supports the premise that water deficit can increase plant WUE (Meyers et al, 1984;Blum, 2009).…”
Section: Wuesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…WUE is often considered an important determinant of yield under stress (Blum, 2009). In our study, biomass WUE (or transpiration) was calculated as the ratio between biomass produced and water consumed (transpired).…”
Section: Wuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For crop-plants the reproductive stage is the most drought sensitive developmental stage (Blum 2009;Peleg et al 2011a). In the current study we applied a short waterstress treatment at the pre-anthesis stage (booting stage, panicle elongation), by withholding water until the stress symptoms appeared in the transgenic plants (leaf rolling, leaf senescence and reduction of photosynthetic activity), follow re-watering (Peleg et al 2011b).…”
Section: (D) (A) (B) (C) (E)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the selection of plants with high-performing yield components, when plants are grown under unfavorable conditions including water deficiency, the time-consuming mapping of quantitative traits, such as yield and stress tolerance, is difficult because genotypes are never unambiguously inferred from the phenotype. Additionally, estimating WUE relies either on long-term measurements of plant-water consumption or assessments of biomass production; and these large-scale approaches are not feasible in individual plant screening efforts (Blum, 2009;Brito et al, 2011;Tuberosa et al, 2011). As a complementary selection strategy, carbon isotope discrimination (∆) -an indirect indicator for WUE (Farquhar et al, 1989;Brito et al, 2011;Elazab et al, 2012) that correlates closely with water deficit tolerance (Centritto et al, 2009) -can be used as a phenomic facility for plant selection procedures under field condition, saving cost and time-consuming in expensive testing in cotton breeding programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%