Effective Transportation Demand Management: Combining Parking Pricing, Transit Incentives, and Transportation Management in a Commercial District of Portland, Oregon

Bianco, Martha J.

doi:10.3141/1711-07

Cited by 33 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A comprehensive analysis of a combined strategy to reduce single-occupancy commuter trips into the Lloyd district, just outside the urban centre of Portland, Oregon is reported in Bianco (2000). The programme involved, as major elements of a package of TDM, the introduction of priced on-street meters and the availability of discounted transit passes.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The evidence base for parking policies—a review

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Parking policy is one of the key links between transport and land-use policy. Parking policies are often compromised in their effectiveness due to the perceived tension between three of the objectives that parking supports: regeneration, restraint and revenue. In particular the belief that parking restraint measures could damage the attractiveness of city centres to both retail and commercial enterprises limits the political acceptability of pricing policies and planning.This paper presents a review of the evidence base upon which commuter, leisure and shopping and residential parking policies are based. Whilst underdeveloped, the literature suggests that greater attention should be given to analysing and presenting the accessibility impacts that different parking restraint measures have on travelers of all modes. The research base in many instances does not support, or provides evidence counter to, the assumption that parking restraint makes centres less attractive. Further disaggregate work is needed to understand how context specific these findings might be. AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank the many people that contributed suggested material for use in this article and to two anonymous referees for their comments.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The evidence base for parking policies—a review

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The international literature also provides many examples of studies made on the impact of parking pricing policies, [7][8][9][10] parking simulation models such as Pamela 11 and the development of parking choice models for special events such as in the article by Sattayhatewa and Smith. 12 Interesting work has also been done on car parks and accessibility such as that of Ferguson 13 who studied user responses to changes made in the supply, location, price and accessibility of parking.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Paying for parking: improving stated-preference surveys

dell’Olio

Ibeas

Moura

2009

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article describes an experiment which introduced random ranges into the variables used for the design of a stated preference survey and its effects on willingness to pay for parking. User behaviour at the time of parking was modelled to determine their willingness to pay in order to get to their final destination more quickly. Calculating willingness to pay is fundamental during the social and economic assessment of projects. It is important to correctly model how car parks and their users interact in order to get values which represent reality as closely as possible. Willingness to pay is calculated using a stated preference survey and by calibrating multinomial logit models, taking variable tastes into account. It is shown that a value with a low variability can be obtained for willingness to pay by correctly establishing the context of the choice and randomly changing the variables around an average value.

show abstract

“…The interested reader may refer to Meyer (1999), Luten et al (2004), FHWA (2012, 2013, Bianco (2000), Bonsall (2009), Jou et al (2011, Thompson and Suter (2012), Ungemah and Dusza (2009) for a comprehensive description of TDM.…”

Section: Travel Planmentioning

confidence: 99%