Effective public speaking: a conceptual framework in the corporate-communication field

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the concept of effective public speaking (EPS), and its antecedents and effects to provide a conceptual framework for the study of EPS in the field of corporate communication. Design/methodology/approach – This is a conceptual paper whose analytical approach draws heavily on theoretical evidence published mainly in the corporate-communication literature. Findings – Public speaking means communicating with rather than to the audience: it does not denote a one-way broadcasting of information but a conversation between the speaker and audience. Strong arguments (logos) presented in a credible (ethos) and exciting (pathos) manner form the basis of EPS. Delivering an interesting, appealing and engaging presentation (i.e. the antecedents of EPS) requires that public speakers combine skills of logic (i.e. public speaking as science) with an “outside-the-box” approach (i.e. public speaking as art). EPS produces positive effects in the professional growth of an organisation’s human resources, trust in corporate leadership, corporate-change process, motivation of human resources and corporate reputation. Practical implications – Underestimating the importance of the preparation phase is a critical mistake in EPS performance. Communicating from the heart ensures the speaker achieves the objective to be heard and remembered by the audience. Developing storytelling skill helps to persuade listeners more effectively because they feel more involved in the discourse. It is important to remember that perfection is artificial and imperfection is natural. EPS requires a training oriented towards personal exploration. As such, companies should invest in public speaking courses that adopt techniques such as experiential theatre. Originality/value – This paper proposes a conceptual framework which can be considered a first step towards compensating for the lack of studies of EPS because, although it does not claim to be thorough in any way, it should encourage future researchers to explore this area in greater depth.

Exploring the Level and Primary Causes of Public Speaking Anxiety Among English Department Students

“…It implies that public speaking can help the speakers improve their quality and facilitate them to transform their ideas, which may benefit others. Its importance is in line with Baccarani & Bonfanti (2015) study, which claimed that public speaking is a persistent and vital activity in today's workplace. Public speaking abilities can support an individual's career, and successful speakers are often recognized as leaders (Rowh, 2009).…”

Rubric formats for the formative assessment of oral presentation skills acquisition in secondary education

“…In this context, message composition and message delivery are considered important (Quianthy, 1990). Strong arguments ('logos') have to be presented in a credible ('ethos') and exciting ('pathos') way (Baccarini & Bonfanti, 2015). Public speaking experts agree that there is not one right way to do an oral presentation (Schneider et al, 2017).…”

“…Both practitioners and scholars agree that students should be able to present orally (e.g., Morreale & Pearson, 2008;Smith & Sodano, 2011). Oral presentation involves the development and delivery of messages to the public with attention to vocal variety, articulation, and non-verbal signals, and with the aim to inform, self-express, relate to and persuade listeners (Baccarini & Bonfanti, 2015;De Grez et al, 2009a;Quianthy, 1990). The current study is restricted to informative presentations (as opposed to persuasive presentations), as these are most common in secondary education.…”

Carpooling: travelers’ perceptions from a big data analysis

“…These issues highlight both the ineffectiveness of previous public policies in responding to the real needs of citizens (Baccarani and Bonfanti, 2015;Baccarani and Golinelli, 2011), on the shifting focus of scholars, policy makers and entrepreneurs on the importance of making the travel sector more oriented to the concept of sustainability in its broadest sense (Douglas, 2015): in this context, from a purely environmental point of view, being sustainable means reducing air and noise pollution (McKinnon et al, 2015;Golinelli, 2012); from an energy utilization viewpoint, the objective of sustainability is to direct choices toward the use of renewable sources (Franzitta et al, 2016); economic sustainability, on the other hand, favors the use of relatively low tariffs (Lippiatt, 2000); whilst from a social perspective (Partridge, 2014), the goal is to ensure the same opportunities for mobility to anyone, including people with impaired movement such as pregnant women or disabled people.…”